My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07975
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:42:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.100
Description
Title I - Yuma Desalting Plant
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1987
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Yuma Desalting Plant Operations Study - Draft Special Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Plans have been assigned to one of five categories. Assignment <br />to categories is based on cost, TVS, and anticipated severity of <br />institutional problems. The categories are as f0Ilow~: <br /> <br />Cateaorv I - <br />procedures. <br />staff during <br /> <br />Plans that involve modification to YDP or operating <br />These plans would be examined by Yuma Project Office <br />the normal process of reducing in-house costs. <br /> <br />Cateaorv II - Plans that are highly cost effective and appear to <br />have no unresolvable political or institutional problems. These <br />plans warrant further con~ideration. <br /> <br />Cateaorv III - Plans that are marginally cost effective and <br />appear to have no unresolvable political or institutional <br />problems. These plan~ would only be considered further if all <br />Category I and II plans were found to be unworkable. <br /> <br />Cateaorv IV - Plans that are cost effective but appear to have <br />unresolvable political or institutional problems. These plans <br />would be not considered in the future unless the political or <br />institutional climate changes. Plans dropped from consideration <br />early in the study are also included in this category. <br /> <br />Cateaorv V - Plans that are not cost effective and do not warrant <br />further consideration. <br /> <br />Plans considered infeasible are those with annual operating costs <br />greater than the currently projected annual costs of operating <br />the YDP. Because the cost estimates are not precise, the cutoff <br />for cost was assumed to be the annual operating cost of the YDP <br />plus 10 percent. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />The analysis shows that a number of proposed plans exhibit <br />potential for cost savings ranging from a few percent to more <br />than 50 percent. Some plans appear implementable while others <br />appear to face insurmountable problems. Table 2 shows the <br />proposed plans listed by category. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Forty eight proposed plans have been evaluated. Twleve plans <br />have cost saving potential and appear implementable. Since the <br />evaluations have been completed using a limited amount of <br />preliminary data, more detailed analysis is required before a <br />final plan is selected for implementation. <br /> <br />The following work items are recommended to be included in the <br />next level of evaluation of proposed plans having significant. <br />cost-saving potential: <br /> <br />iii <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.