Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Plans have been assigned to one of five categories. Assignment <br />to categories is based on cost, TVS, and anticipated severity of <br />institutional problems. The categories are as f0Ilow~: <br /> <br />Cateaorv I - <br />procedures. <br />staff during <br /> <br />Plans that involve modification to YDP or operating <br />These plans would be examined by Yuma Project Office <br />the normal process of reducing in-house costs. <br /> <br />Cateaorv II - Plans that are highly cost effective and appear to <br />have no unresolvable political or institutional problems. These <br />plans warrant further con~ideration. <br /> <br />Cateaorv III - Plans that are marginally cost effective and <br />appear to have no unresolvable political or institutional <br />problems. These plan~ would only be considered further if all <br />Category I and II plans were found to be unworkable. <br /> <br />Cateaorv IV - Plans that are cost effective but appear to have <br />unresolvable political or institutional problems. These plans <br />would be not considered in the future unless the political or <br />institutional climate changes. Plans dropped from consideration <br />early in the study are also included in this category. <br /> <br />Cateaorv V - Plans that are not cost effective and do not warrant <br />further consideration. <br /> <br />Plans considered infeasible are those with annual operating costs <br />greater than the currently projected annual costs of operating <br />the YDP. Because the cost estimates are not precise, the cutoff <br />for cost was assumed to be the annual operating cost of the YDP <br />plus 10 percent. <br /> <br />RESULTS <br /> <br />The analysis shows that a number of proposed plans exhibit <br />potential for cost savings ranging from a few percent to more <br />than 50 percent. Some plans appear implementable while others <br />appear to face insurmountable problems. Table 2 shows the <br />proposed plans listed by category. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Forty eight proposed plans have been evaluated. Twleve plans <br />have cost saving potential and appear implementable. Since the <br />evaluations have been completed using a limited amount of <br />preliminary data, more detailed analysis is required before a <br />final plan is selected for implementation. <br /> <br />The following work items are recommended to be included in the <br />next level of evaluation of proposed plans having significant. <br />cost-saving potential: <br /> <br />iii <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />