My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07975
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:42:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.100
Description
Title I - Yuma Desalting Plant
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1987
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Yuma Desalting Plant Operations Study - Draft Special Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1 . <br />Imperial <br />simulate <br /> <br />Refine the eRSS. Refine the CRSS data base below <br />Darn and reconfigure the model to more accurately <br />the Colorado River in the vicinity of the YDP. <br /> <br />2. Evaluate Cateaorv I Plans. <br />evaluated by the Yuma Project staff <br />house cost reduction activities. <br /> <br />These plans would be <br />as part of the normal <br /> <br />in- <br /> <br />3. Evaluate Cateaorv II Plans. Institutional and political <br />problems would be examined .to determine whether the first <br />assumption that problems are resolvable is valid. Those plans <br />that survive the first screening would then be studied in more <br />detail to refine estimates of yield and cost, and to ensure <br />technical implement ability. <br /> <br />4. ~valuate Additional Plans. Additional plans meriting <br />further consideration were introduced during the in-house review <br />process. These plans, and any other that might subsequently be <br />introduced, should be evaluated along with those ment~oned above. <br />These additional plans are as follows: <br /> <br />a. Some unused Parker-Davis Project power might be <br />available to run the YDP. Cost of this power would be <br />considerably less than other power now available for YDP <br />operation. <br /> <br />b. Substitute water in sufficient quantities to eliminate <br />YDP production would be provided from system storage. A <br />debt on storage could accumulate for several years before <br />being satisfied by surplus flows. A risk exists that the <br />debt may not be satisfied before an onset of a drought but <br />the tradeoff is that the accumulation of 4 or 5 years of <br />unnecessary YDP production costs can be avoided. <br /> <br />5. Establish Advisorv Council. An advisory council <br />composed of representatives of the Basin States would be formed <br />to advise Reclamation on political and institutional constraints. <br /> <br />6. Select Plan of Action. After completing Items 1-5, <br />select the plan(s) for implementation, develop an implementation <br />schedule, document findings, and pursue authorizing legislation. <br /> <br />iv <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.