Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'1~'-'3~8 <br />'J 'J;": ..J <br /> <br />ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND <br />HISTORICAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />The loss of archaeological sites and information <br />would be irretrievable. <br /> <br />DISPOSAL OF PUBLIC LANDS <br /> <br />Disposal of public lands would result in a loss of <br />administrative control of all resource values on <br />these lands except any valid existing rights and <br />existing land use authorizations. <br /> <br />IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVE E <br />(PREFERRED AL TERNA TIVE) <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON SOCIAL AND <br />ECONOMIC CONDITIONS <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Locatable Minerals Management. <br />Any increase in operating costs because of plans of <br />operations being required would lower the potential <br />for economic production. These requirements <br />would not have measurable social or economic <br />impacts on the Planning Area. <br /> <br />Impacts from Oil, Gas, and Geothermal <br />Management. The Planning Area would not <br />experience measurable social or economic impacts <br />because of the low potential for occurrence of these <br />resources. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wildlife Habitat Management. <br />Increases in forage supply could translate into <br />increases in gamc populations and in associated <br />recreational activities, which could lead to increases <br />in Planning Area income and employment. <br /> <br />Impacts from Livestock Grazing Management. <br />Eliminating grazing in certain areas and not <br />allocating any additional forage to livestock would <br />reduce present preference by 927 AUMs. Any <br />decreases in A UMs could result in fInancial losses <br />for the affected ranching operations. <br /> <br />PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE(E) IMPACTS <br /> <br />Impacts from Forest Management. The potential <br />sale of l,200MBF of commercial timber would <br />support area income and employment and produce <br />$30,000 in federal revenue. On the other hand, 530 <br />MBF of potential harvest would not be available for <br />production and would mean a potential loss of <br />$13,000 of federal revenue. <br /> <br />Impacts !'rom Recreational Management. The <br />economic benefIts from recreation opportunities <br />would be medium to high, but unmeasured, and <br />would depend on the area of the impact. BenefIts <br />would occur in those businesses providing tourist <br />and recreation sales and services. All ESA counties <br />are dependent on tourism related incomes sectors <br />for their socia-economic well being and would <br />receive a positive impact to income and employ- <br />ment from a 40% increase in recreation activity. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON SOCIAL AND <br />ECONOMIC CONDITIONS <br /> <br />The cumulative impact on the local economy is <br />likely to be benefIcial. The actual impact is <br />localized but not presently quantified. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON LOCATABLE <br />MINERALS <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Locatable Minerals Management. <br />Identifying 674,490 acres of federal mineral estate, <br />of which 105,368 acres have a high likelihood for <br />the occurrence of locatable minerals, as open to <br />mineral entry and location would make these lands <br />available for exploration and development under the <br />general mining laws. <br /> <br />Impacts from Withdrawals. Withdrawing 54,077 <br />acres of federal mineral estate from mineral entry <br />and location would prcclude any possible mineral <br />exploration or development of these lands. These <br />lands would be withdrawn for protection of <br />recreation and scenic (53,305 acres), and riparian <br />(395 acres) values, and for R&PP classifications and <br />agency protective withdrawals (362 acres). The <br />lands which would be withdrawn contain about <br /> <br />4-55 <br />