My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07926
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:40:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1991
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Resource Area - Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement - Draft - Chapter 4 to end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER FOUR <br /> <br />5,160 acres with a high likelihood for the <br />occurrence of locatable minerals. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON OIL, GAS, AND <br />GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Oil, Gas and Geothermal <br />Management. Managing 680,911 acres of federal <br />oil and gas estate as open to the leasing of fluid <br />minerals would result in these resources being <br />available. About 46,007 acres not being available <br />and 85,567 acres with stipulations would result in <br />little impact to the oil and gas program because of <br />little likelihood for the occurrence of these <br />resources. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON SALEABLE MINERALS <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Saleable Minerals Management. <br />permitting the disposal of mineral materials on <br />666,530 acres of federal mineral estate would more <br />than satisfy the current demand of 12,500 cubic <br />yards annually and meet the anticipated future <br />demand. Not permitting the disposal of saleable <br />mineral materials on 62,037 acres offederal mineral <br />estate, or implementing seasonal closures for <br />mineral material disposal on 188,970 acres of <br />federal mineral estate, would not result in any <br />significant impact due to the amount of materials <br />which would remain available. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON SOILS AND WATER <br />RESOURCES <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Soil and Water Resources <br />Management. The continued implementation of the <br />"Long Gulch Sediment Control and Riparian <br />Habitat Improvement Project' would continue to <br />reduce downstream sediment yields by up to 300 <br /> <br />tons per year, increase vegetation production for <br />watershed protection, improve the hydrologic <br />functions of the riparian zone by raising the alluvial <br />water table, and provide some downstream flood <br />control benefits by reducing peak flows from runoff <br />events. <br /> <br />Erosion control projects, including those primarily <br />designed to increase plant basal COVer on uplands, <br />would indirectly result in improved watershed <br />conditions. Securing minimum instream flows, where <br />appropriate, would protect water quality and <br />hydrologic functions. Maintaining roads and <br />existing water source developments in good <br />condition would reduce erosion and sedimentation. <br /> <br />Impacts lI'om Locatable Minerals Management. If <br />mineral development occurs on 674,490 acres in the <br />Planning Area identified as open to mineral entry <br />and location, increased sedimentation and physical <br />damage to stream beds or banks could potentially <br />result. These impacts would most likely occur <br />somewhere within the 105,368 acres that have a high <br />likelihoud for the occurrence of locatable minerals. <br />Physical disturbance to stream channels and <br />increases in sedimentation would be greatest from <br />placer mining operations. Heavy metal <br />contamination of surface water is possible from <br />mine water discharges and spoil-pile runoff. Heavy <br />metal pollution is usually associated with mine <br />drainage resulting from the oxidation of pyrite. The <br />highest potential for this situation to occur is on <br />lands south and west of Lake City and 1,200 acres <br />near Iris and Midway. Underground mining <br />operation create the potential for ground water <br />aquifer dewatering and mixing of water from <br />different aquifers, diminishing both groundwater <br />quantity and quality. <br /> <br />Impacts from Oil, Gas, and Geothermal <br />Management. No significant environmental impacts <br />are anticipated from one or two wells. If any <br />development were to occur, surface-disturbing <br />activities such as road and dri11 pad construction <br />could result in increased sediment yields. <br />Accidental fluid discharges, such as produced water <br />during drilling operations could contaminate surface <br />waters and soils. Seasonal or no surface occupancy <br />stipulations in this alternative would lessen these <br />potential impacts if development occurs. <br /> <br />4-56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.