Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER FOUR <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON <br />ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL <br />RESOURCES <br /> <br />Existing policies, procedures, and regulations would <br />provide for the protection, preservation and <br />enhancement of sites from authorized projects. <br />Effects from other dispersed activities, and nature, are <br />not subject to standard operating procedures, thus <br />these effects would not be mitigated and preventative <br />or corrective actions would not be implemented. <br /> <br />Increased visitor use could result in some increase in <br />vandalism, theft, and destruction of sites. These <br />impacts would be reduced by interpretation and <br />education. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON RIGHTS-OF-WAY <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from R1ghts..,C-Way and Corridor <br />Management. Designation of 63,863 acres of rights- <br />of-way exclusion areas and 129,144 acres as rights-of- <br />way avoidance areas would result in additional costs <br />to utility companies in planning, designing, and <br />constructing facilities around these areas. <br /> <br />Seasonal restrictions on rights-of-way construction <br />could increase the proponent's costs. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON RIGHTS-OF-WAY <br /> <br />Designating 193,007 acres of public land as eitber <br />rights-of-way exclusion or avoidance areas, and <br />restricting construction seasonally would increase <br />development costs. <br /> <br />SHORT- TERM USE V5. LONG- TERM <br />PRODUCTIVITY <br /> <br />SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />Mineral development would potentially result in some <br />increases in long-term erosion and sediment yields <br />and possibly some decrease in the quality of surface <br />waters from mine discharge and spoil pile runoff. <br />Some loss in soil productivity would be expected in <br /> <br />areas where surface disturbing activities are proposed. <br />Uplands and riparian zones proposed for intensive <br />livestock and wildlife management would experience <br />improved soil and water resource conditions. <br /> <br />RIPARIAN ZONES <br /> <br />Implementing IGMCs and changes in livestock grazing <br />utilization would result in long-term improvement in <br />riparian vegetation conditions. <br /> <br />WILDLIFE HABITAT <br /> <br />Big game, upland bird, and non-game habitat would <br />be improved under this alternative. Colorado Division <br />of Wildlife long-term herd goals for elk and deer, on <br />public lands, would be achieved. A marked <br />improvement in fIShery streams would be realized <br />primarily due to the reduction of total forage <br />utilization in riparian areas. <br /> <br />LIVESTOCK GRAZING <br /> <br />Restrictions on livestock grazing would reduce <br />carrying capacities and would result in long-term <br />e1imination of some livestock forage allocations from <br />total preference. <br /> <br />IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE <br />COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES <br /> <br />MINERALS <br /> <br />Once a particular area has been committed to a <br />single, non-mineral use, it is not likely that the use <br />would be reversed. Tbus, mineral deposits within <br />tbese areas would be irreversibly committed to not <br />being developed and would be unavailable. <br /> <br />SOIL AND WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />The loss of soil through wind and water erosion would <br />be irretrievable. <br /> <br />VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Construction of permanent structures such as roads, <br />buildings, and powerlines would result in an <br />irretrievable reduction and loss of scenic quality. <br /> <br />4-54 <br />