Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~-"'~7 <br />(} :J ,: j ') <br /> <br />Impacts from Visual Resource ManagemenL <br />Managing l,5T! acres in the segment in the proposed <br />American Basin ACEC under VRM Class I objectives <br />would result in surface disturbing activities being <br />required to be naturally appearing upon the <br />completion of the activity. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wilderness Study Area ManagemenL <br />Impacts in this alternative are analyzed assuming that <br />WSA status would not be in effect, in the event that <br />Congress acts on, and decides not to designate any <br />part of any WSA as wilderness. If any part of <br />Segment A is designated as wilderness, those lands <br />would be managed as wilderness. Refer to Impacts <br />ftoom WSA Management in the discussion of impacts <br />of Alternative A (Continuation of Current <br />Management) for impacts applicable to all <br />alternatives, as long as WSA status applies. <br /> <br />Impacts from Rights-of-Way ManagemenL Managing <br />1,577 acres in Unit D-S (American Basin ACEC as a <br />rights-of-way exclusion area, and 2,408 acres in Units <br />0-17 and 0-20 as rights-of-way avoidance areas would <br />result in few, if any future surface disturbing activities <br />fro~ this land use. Rights-of-way are prohibited in <br />the existing 'Loop Road withdrawal C-0125423 (330 <br />acres). <br /> <br />Impacts from Withdrawals and Classllications. <br />Continuing the BLM protective withdrawal C-0125423, <br />and effecting the withdrawal in the proposed <br />American Basin ACEC would close these lands to <br />mineral entry and location, and would protect scenic <br />values by precluding most surface disturbing activities <br />within Segment A on 1,907 of the 4,315 acres of <br />public land. If the President recommends the <br />segment to Congress for designation, a temporary <br />three-year withdrawal would take effect that would <br />segregate (1), the federal mineral estate from entry <br />and location under the general mining laws, and (2), <br />the federal surface estate from future appropriation <br />under the general land laws, thereby protecting the <br />values in the segment from surface disturbance during <br />this period. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON VALUES IN <br />SEGMENT A <br /> <br />Increased recreation use, primarily off-highway vehicle <br />use, could result in some increase of impacts to scenic <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE D IMPACTS <br /> <br />values. Impacts from other activities would be offset <br />by required compliance with patrols, BLM's surface <br />management regulations, required plans of operation <br />in the proposed ACEC, special ACEC management <br />attention, rights-of-way exclusion and avoidance areas, <br />VRM Class I objectives in the ACEC, and <br />management actions in the plan for the Alpine <br />Triangle SRMA. <br /> <br />If designation occurs, more attention and recognition <br />would bring in more visitors, potentially resulting in <br />more impacts to scenic values. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Visual Resource Management. <br />Managing the Redcloud Peak RNNACEC (D-2, <br />5,950 acres), American Basin ACEC (D-S, 1,577 <br />acres), and the Dillon Pinnacles ACEC (0-10, 190 <br />acres) under VRM Class I objectives would improve <br />or maintain scenic quality on these lands as a result of <br />more restrictive visual resource objectives. Managing <br />nearly the remainder of the entire planning area <br />under VRM class U objectives, which generally <br />require more mitigation of impacts to scenic quality <br />then current VRM ratings, would enhance the visual <br />quality of the area or result in a greater degree of <br />mitigation of visual impacts. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL <br />AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Archaeological and Historical Resource <br />ManagemenL The gathering of archaeological or <br />historical information required by law in response to <br />project development or proposed disturbance would <br />contribute to our current knowledge and data base. <br />However, any physical disturbance and extraction of <br />information from sites, other than that for <br />documentation, would remove that data from context, <br />and destroy the integrity of sites. <br /> <br />4-53 <br />