Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lJ009~8 <br /> <br />a. Currently, the conservation credit <br /> <br />payment is $75 per AF of water saved or.50 percent of <br /> <br />,- <br />f <br /> <br />total program costs, whichever is less. <br /> <br />b. At its June, 1990, meeting, the <br /> <br />Metropolitan Board will consider increasing the <br /> <br />conservation credit payment to $154 per AF.. This <br /> <br />compares to a wholesale water rate for treated <br /> <br />noninterruptible water of $230/AF. <br /> <br />2. Credit Pro~rams. During the first year of <br /> <br />the program, a variety of conservation programs have <br /> <br />been implemented. <br /> <br />a. Santa Monica has implemented a pilot <br /> <br />ULF toilet replacement program designed to retrofit 25 <br /> <br />percent of the households in the city. Under this <br /> <br />program, Santa Monica offers a $100 ~ebate per <br /> <br />retrofitted bathroom to households or property owners <br /> <br />in a total of 12,000 residences. <br /> <br />(Total program cost <br /> <br />$2,362,000). <br /> <br />b. Los Angeles has implemented a similar <br /> <br />pilot ULF toilet replacement program designed to <br /> <br />retrofit 7,500 households in the first year ($900,000). <br /> <br />c. The San Diego County Water Authority <br /> <br />(SDCWA) has implemented an experimental large turf audit <br /> <br />program to reduce outdoor water use ($285,000). <br /> <br />d. Major programs patterned after <br /> <br />successful efforts in San Jose, California and Phoenix, <br /> <br />Arizona t6 install low-flow showerheads and toilet dams <br /> <br />in existing structures have been implemented in the <br /> <br />-18- <br />