My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07376
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07376
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:18:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.100
Description
Title I - Yuma Desalting Plant
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1988
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Operation and Maintenance Funding for the Yuma Desalting Plant, Draft Special Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />million. Reject stream requirements would be 31,000 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />lIdvantages: <br />o Reduces power coIlSllllpt.ion yet maintains full productivity <br /> <br />(assuming the new membranes are acceptable) . <br /> <br />Disadllantages: <br /> <br />o Requires sare testing of membranes' effectiveness before using <br /> <br />them. '!be life of the merobrane could be longer or shorter than the <br /> <br />=xent cellulose acetate membrane. '!be disinfection process for the <br /> <br />new merobrane is m:>re difficult and costly. <br /> <br />o Requires other m:xIifications which are expected to be fairly minor <br /> <br />in scope and cost. <br /> <br />o '!be cost of the new nenbranes could m:>re than offset any savings. <br /> <br />status: Testing will be conchJcted by Recalamation on the new membranes to <br /> <br />deteoni.ne their cost effectiveness. <br /> <br />AS. Pre-Pav Future Electri"'"l r",""citv Charaes <br /> <br />This plan proposes pre-paying capacity (demand) charges in anticipation <br /> <br />that the charges would increase substantially by the time the need arises. <br /> <br />Considering =rent power market conditions, the ,chances for negotiating a <br /> <br />favorable contract seen slim. Little evidence could be found for any cost <br /> <br />savings by prepaying capacity charges, so costs and reject stream <br /> <br />replaoerrent needs would be the sarre as the base case. No potential savings <br /> <br />would be anticipated. <br /> <br />''\ 'r' .~. '" 'Ii ' ! <br />!~" 1 It. ~ ~ ",i' , ';,' <br />~J. I;, ~', :'! ;;\; ;'. ; l' <br />5 _ '3- {L..:... t' No~, I<l <br />Ii" a ~ n l;&.-- <"'", <br />'" ~ g ?':.~ '!' ~"'.': .' .. <br />"11 J .d>,~ :;;; '~ ~ <br />.~ I..J/... _.... "'".. <br /> <br />.~, ~~ t..~ <br />.', ",' l <br />f-"~ ~.'\ ~ <br /> <br />~'JI ..~~~ <br />. <br />j ::_~ <br /> <br />"-"~;"'" :'>:1........ ~ ~'Il.!J <br />'( ..:" :> ":~; :.~ ;;"1\ ~'~ ) ~~, <br />...., "', I.,",;i 1',,11 <br />u.....'..... ....... '" ,- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.