Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, of'",~ <br />.L't ,.. ,I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />of a reconnaissance nature, to be carried out <br />under the general authority of reclamation <br />law, and to be coordinated with other studies <br />being conducted under the Water Resources <br />Planning Act of 1965. <br />In )uly 1970 the Bureau of Reclamation <br />initiated the Westwide Studies investigation <br />with a fiscal year 1970-71 budget of $1,480,- <br />000, The Bureau distributed a study plan out- <br />line in August 1970, invited comments there- <br />on, and held a meeting with representatives <br />of the eleven western states and several fed- <br />eral agencies on September 30 and October 1, <br />1970, The state and federal agencies present- <br />ed their views and commented on the the <br />proposed study plan outline, The Colorado <br />River Board developed comments which <br />were included in a single California state- <br />ment presented at the meeting by Herbert <br />W. Greydanus of the Department of Water <br />Resources. The Chief Engineer commented <br />on the aspects of the study plan outline spe- <br />cifically relating to the Colorado River. The <br />principal comments at this meeting were in <br />the following areas: <br /> <br />1. The plan does not emphasize the water resources <br />problems of the Colorado River Basin which are <br />the principal purpose of the legislation. <br />2. The states want to participate at the policy level of <br />the Westwide Studies as well as at the working <br />level. <br />3. The proposed study is broader in scope than in- <br />tended by the legislation and would thereby tend to <br />be too costly. <br />4. Centralized control of the study is needed; this <br />should be accomplished with appropriation of aU <br />funds to the Bureau of Reclamation for further <br />allocation to others as necessary to finance specific <br />inputs. <br /> <br />There were some dissenting views to these <br />points, however. For example, the Pacific <br />Northwest River Basins Commission recom- <br />mended that existing coordination and fund- <br />ing arrangments under the Water Resources <br />Council should be used to the greatest extent <br />possible. Comments of federal agencies gen- <br />erally covered the area of funding, extent of <br />agency participation, and responsibility. The <br />representatives of the Colorado River Basin <br />states emphasized that the major thrust of <br /> <br />Titles I and II was to develop a plan which <br />would provide additional water supplies for <br />the Colorado River. <br />A task force of representatives of the states <br />and the federal agencies was formed to draft <br />a plan of study for the investigation. The task <br />force was divided into three teams and as- <br />signed the responsibilities for developing (a) <br />study objectives, scope, assumptions, and cri- <br />teria; (b) study outline, exhibits, and recom- <br />mendations; and (c) work plans, schedule, <br />and budget programs. The Board's Principal <br />Hydraulic Engineer participated in the work <br />of this task force which developed a draft for <br />the plan of study, In December 1970, the <br />draft plan of study was sent for review to the <br />eleven western states, various federal agen- <br />cies, Western States Water Council, river ba- <br />sin commissions, and interagency commit- <br />tees. <br />As drafted, the plan of study defined the <br />objective and scope of the Westwide Studies <br />as being the development of a general plan to <br />meet the water development and manage- <br />ment needs of the eleven western states, with <br />a special effort being the development of a <br />regional water plan to serve as the frame- <br />work for coordination and construction of <br />projects in the Colorado River Basin. The <br />plan of study further proposed that water <br />requirements and supplies be finalized dur- <br />ing the first two years of the study and pre- <br />sented in the June 30, 1973, progress report; <br />that the June 1975 progress report will in- <br />clude the presentation of a regional water <br />plan for the Colorado River Basin and alter- <br />native water plans for the entire west; and <br />that the final June 1977 report present the <br />recommended plan, selected from the vari- <br />ous alternatives, Although this draft was <br />somewhat of an improvement over the origi- <br />nal plan of study, it still did not meet many <br />of the important criticisms made by rhe sta- <br />te's representatives, <br />In the latter part of 1970 the Commissioner <br />of Reclamation formed an Advisory Commit- <br />tee for the Westwide Studies consisting of <br />representatives of approximately 30 entities, <br />including states, boards, commissions, and <br /> <br />37 <br />