My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07276
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:36 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:13:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/17/2003
Author
Gregg Hobbs
Title
Inside the Drama of the Colorado River Compact Negotiations: Negotiating the Apportionment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Mr. Carpenter has been preparing a compact proposition. Will <br />you let us have your proposal? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Carpenter: <br />(starts out with maximum force of headwaters position, tone of rhetorician, <br />then alters to diplomatic statesmanlike tone as negotiations go along) <br />Certainly, Mr. Chairman. We propose that the construction of <br />any and all reservoirs or other works in the lower river shall in no <br />manner arrest or interfere with the subsequent development of the <br />territory of any of the upper states or their use of water. Further, <br />these lower river structures shall not have and cannot assert or claim <br />any prior or preferred right or title to the use of these waters to the <br />detriment of the upper states. <br />From the outset, we have been presented with the physical fact <br />that 60% to 70% of the waters that pass by Yuma, Arizona originate in <br />the mountains of Colorado. Can we, in fact, use all this water in our <br />own territory? No, we cannot. The major part will always flow out to <br />other states. However, the upper states do have the inherent right to <br />use the water rising and flowing within their territory, as necessary, <br />for their self-preservation and development, at least to the extent that <br />they do not injure their neighbors below. <br /> <br />Secretary Hoover: <br />(taken aback by Carpenter's headwaters at all costs proposition in the face <br />of what-he-thought to be the Coloradan's statesmanlike capability) <br />Does not your proposal imply that an equitable division of water <br />is for you to perpetually take all the water you want? If we are to get <br />equitable division there are perhaps two bases upon which it could be <br />approached. First, on how much land is to be irrigated. Second, on <br />the percentages of water to be allocated. <br /> <br />Mr. Carpenter: <br />(somewhat arrogant and pompous lecture to Chair) <br />As the Commission is well aware, acreage limitations <br />necessarily bring in issues related to the origin of the water. Origin is <br />a concept that runs throughout international law, specifying that the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.