Laserfiche WebLink
<br />41 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />Differentll. <br /> <br />~9.8S.,OOO <br />46.2011,OOQ <br />23,646,000 <br /> <br />$~8, 109, 000 <br />46,290,000 <br />11,819.000 <br /> <br />tion Districts, or both, if such pUIIlping can be economically <br />justified, and if by November 1, 1954, tbe board of dIrectors of <br />these respective districts indicate a desir,e that sucb pump UDlt or <br />units be Illcluded for study and posSIble IllclUSlOn Wlthlll the scope <br />of tbe Narrows project." <br />The preceding conclusions and recommenda.tions were approved and <br />adopted by the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Tbe Bureau of <br />Reclamation concurred and initiated the necessa.ry studies. <br /> <br />Munu.ipal and industrial water 8Upply <br />During the investigations of the unit, several communities down- <br />stream irom tbe Narrows Da.m Bite evidenced interest in a reservation <br />of water for future municipal and industrial needs, No firm commit- <br />Dlent was made. It appears that the communities have, or ca.n readily <br />obtain, an ample supply from ground water for all foreseeable ~eedsi <br />therefore this possibility bas not been incorporated as a functlOn of <br />the plan' of development, In the unlikely event of urgent need for <br />mUnIcipal and industrial wa.ter in addition to, or as a repla.cement <br />for, ground water tbe communities pTobably would bave to a.cqu5!'~ <br />irrigation water. rights. <br />DEFERRED POTENTIALITIES <br /> <br />Under date of September I, \954, region 7, Bureau of Reclamation, <br />transmitted its finul cost estimates on the two resef\~oir sites) along <br />with supporting data, to the Colorado Water Conservation Board, At <br />the same time, the consultants, Woodward-Clyde-Sherard & ,Associ- <br />ates, who had been following the course of the Bureau estrmates, <br />submitted their report on compartLti\'e cost estimates. <br />A summary comparison or the cost estimates is as foUmvs: <br /> <br />Bure.u 0' <br />Reellmllian <br /> <br />WOOIll4'lllll. <br />c!Yt~~~I~rt~~d <br /> <br />WIIIlCOunty____________ <br />NlrrtlYws . <br /> <br />The priucipa.l difference between the two estimates is that the con- <br />sultants recommended u stnlcture at the Weld County site utilizing <br />--- -a much: .t.hiuner core or im pervious material than the designs prepared <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation. The chief engineer's office of the <br />__ Bureau of Reclamation stated that there would be no compromise <br />with safety; therefore, if a dam were built at the Weld County site <br />by tbe Bureau of Reclamation it would be built according to the <br />specifications prepared by the chief engineer. The cost would then <br />be essentially as estimated, <br />In 0. memorandum to the Colorado Water Conser\'tltion Board, On <br />September 4, \964, the director of the board concluded and recom- <br />mended as rouows: <br />(a) That to date the Bureau of Reclamation has expended <br />!,-pproximately $1,500,000 in investigations, et cetera, on the <br />Narrows project; the State of Colorado hIlS expended approxi- <br />mately $200,000; nnd local interesis (both for and against) have <br />expended significant but undetermined sums. <br />(b) Tha.t {urther site selection investigatio118 would be rruitless. <br />(c) That the construction of the Narrows project would provide <br />major economic benefits t.o the people of Colorado for generat.ions <br />to come. <br />(d) That if major reservoir storo.ge is constructed on the lower <br />South Platte River in the for~eea.ble future, it will ha.ve to be <br />constructed under rccla.ma.t.iou law at the Narrows site. <br />"It is the staff recommendation that this Board immediately trans- <br />mit its official comments on the Narrows Unit oC the Missouri River <br />Basin project to the Secretary of the Interior, requesting that construc- <br />tion be init~8t.ed as speedily as possible on the Narrows Unit of the <br />Missouri River Basin pro/'ect, ""rith a dam to be constructed at the <br />Narrows site in substantia accordance witb the plans contained in the <br />site selection r~port heret..oCore presented to this Board by region 7 of <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, with the CoUowing additions: <br />"A. Tbat tbe project include a pump unit on tbe South Platte <br />River near Sterling, Colo., for the purpose or increasing tbe project <br />water supply approximately 32,000 acre-feet annuaUy, <br />"B. That the project include a pump unit or units near or <br />adjacent to the N arrows Reservoir, for the purpose of supplying <br />additional irrigation water to either the Riverside or Bijou Irriga- <br /> <br />FoUowing elimination of the Weld County Dam site in favor of <br />the Narrows site in September 1964 the Colorado Water Conserva- <br />tion Board requested tho.t studies of' the N arrows u~it be ~xpedited. <br />Tue Board further requested that the Narrows Ulllt ,tud,es be ex- <br />panded to include: (A) a pump unit on the South Platte RIver near <br />Sterling, Colo" for the purpose of increasing the project water supply, <br />and (B) a pump unit or units Dea.r or adjacent to tbe Narrows R~ser- <br />voir, for tbe purpose of supplying a.dditional irrigat!on water to. eIther <br />tbe Riverside or Bijou Irrigation Districts, or both, if sucu pUIIlplI!g can <br />be economically justified, Later, the Board also requested .tudles on <br />a weU field or pump lift to provide supplemental water to dltc.b <br />systems in tbe Julesburg a.rea. <br />Because tbe floods of June 1965 renewed interest in t.be control of <br />floods from Bijou Creek, n potential channel for diverting Bijou Creek <br />into the N arrows Reservoir was also studied. <br />These additional potentialities were studied to reconnaissance <br />Bta.lldards. None or them are recommended for inclusion as component.s <br />of tbe Narrows unit at this Lime. They are considered as separo.ble <br />segments that should be justified incrementally. A brie{ descript.ion <br />of each potentiAlity foUow:s, <br /> <br />su,rling plLmpinp plant <br /> <br />The exisling Norlh Sterling Irrigation Di~tri~t lands are . include? <br />in the Soutb Platte Water Conservancy DlStncl. The fund claSS1- <br />flcation survey for the Narrows unit disclosed tbat in 1955 the North <br />Sterling Irrigation District contained 31,410 acres or irrigated irrignble <br />land "nd 4,548 acres of class 5W land or 35,058 acres in service, The <br />diEtrict also contn.ined 14,684 aeres of irrignble dry land. <br />Aft.er the Narrows unit. is in operation, approximately 3G,GGG <br />acre-feel, of surplus flows will continue t.o accrl1e to the stream below <br />Narrow8 Dam. In an effort to provide a lIse for these flows in Colorado, <br />a study was made of tbe potential Sterling pumping plant, The <br />