Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br /> <br />fl ., ., " .. 1 <br />t.J J ,.: '.. J .L. <br /> <br />COLUMN EXPLANATION FOR WmTE RIVER OPERATIONS STUDY <br /> <br />CONDITION B <br /> <br />ColUllU1 No. <br /> <br />1. IlelIIand below South Fork: frOlll CoIUlllD 17 of the U.8.B.R. "White River <br /> <br />Operation 8tucly". Thie demand was cCllllpUted by accounting ~or diversions. <br /> <br /> <br />returns and accretions between the "bel_ Meeker pge" and the below the <br /> <br />80uth Fork of the White River. The demand belaw the "Below Meeker Gage" <br /> <br />was determined by the Bureau of Reclamation as being the demand between <br /> <br />Lower Powe 11 Pal'k and Piceance Creek end was found to be e maxilDUlll of 25 c. f. s. <br /> <br />The ditches that are active in that section of tbe river are as follows: <br /> <br />IDDBs Eo Reynolds 16.90 e.f.a. <br />E. R. Imas 9.21 a.f.e. <br />G. 8. Wi tier 7.00 c..f.s_ <br />Uayes 1.00 e.l.a. <br />McDowell 6.82 e.l... <br />Calhoun 3.24 e.f.e. <br />Sandy .47 c.t.s. <br /> <br />.."" <br /> <br />44.64 c.t.s. <br /> <br />'\'" <br /> <br />2. Historic flow ot the South Fork: Column 19 of the U.S.B.R. study. <br /> <br />3. Depletions by the Piceance Pipeline and the Wheeler Philips Reservoir: <br /> <br />from Column 20, U.S.B.R. Study. <br /> <br />4. Depletions by the Rocky Hountain Power Company'~ works filed on 1957: <br />Estimated to be 39.6\ of the Measured flow ot the South FOl'k at Buford <br /> <br />........ <br />".'X..::.,. , <br /> <br />less 101 for fish flows. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Shortages to Rocky MOuntain Power COmpany's 57 filings. <br /> <br />a <br />