My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07064
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1966
Author
Unknown
Title
White River Water Supply Studies - 1966 - 1975
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,1','" e: ') <br />... _' V "'4 tJ... <br /> <br />Column No. <br /> <br />6. Depleted flows of the South Pork. <br /> <br />7. Demand below "At Buford" equal to ColUIBII 1 minus Column 6. <br /> <br />8. 9. Historic flow in the White River measured at "At Buford" and "Near Buford: <br /> <br />gaging stations. "Near Buford" gaging statton is the proposed point of <br /> <br />diversion for the YellOW' Jacket Project. <br />10. Demand below the YellOW' Jacket Diversion Damj of senior water rights. <br />11. Minimum fish flow requirements below the Yellow Jacket Diversion Dem. <br /> <br />12. Required flow bel!fW yellow Jacket Diversion Dam. The larger of Column <br /> <br />10 or 11. <br /> <br />13.- Increase in Bypass required at Yellow Jacket diversion. dam, computed by c~ <br /> <br />. . paring Column 12 with Column 44 of the U.S.B.R. project operations study. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />Shortages to the YellOW' Jacket Project: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />13 <br />CondiUon A shorgates are assUllled to have oecurred in Condition I/. - plus: <br /> <br />o. Increased shortages are assumed to occur at anytime an increased bypass ~~ <br /> <br />was required unless: <br /> <br />3. The shortages could have been made up by rsducing sp111s occurring in <br /> <br />Condition A of U.S.B.R. project operation studies. In determining <br /> <br />whether spills would have reduced shortages, physical water supply was <br /> <br />taken into account as well as storage in the Lost Park and Ripple Reser- <br /> <br />voirs and stream gains between the reservoir and the diversion dam. <br />,< <br /> <br />16. White River below diversion daml Column 44, U.S.B.R. operation studies <br /> <br />adjusted for Column 13. <br /> <br />17. Remaining surplus water in the South Pork: Equals Column 6 or the surplus <br />above the main stream demands below the South Fork. <br />i8. Water supply available to Rocky Mountain PCIW1Br CoIIIpany. 1964 filings on the <br />South Fork: Equals 22.91 of the flow of the South Pork at the Buford gaging <br />Station. <br />20. Shortage to Rocky Mountain Power Co. 1964 filings I Column 18 minus Column 19. <br /> <br />21. Total Shortage to Rocky Mountain Power Company water rights, COlumn 5 plus <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Column 20. <br /> <br />":? <br />,p <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.