My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07064
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07064
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1966
Author
Unknown
Title
White River Water Supply Studies - 1966 - 1975
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />lIJZ<J'5,) <br /> <br />Column No. <br /> <br />6. Depleted flows of the South Fork. <br /> <br />7. Demand below "At Buford" equal to Column 1 minus Column 6. <br /> <br />8 - 9. Historic flow in the White River measured at "At Buford" and "Near Buford: <br /> <br />gaging stations. "Near Buford" gaging station is the proposed point of <br /> <br />diversion for the Yellow Jacket Project. <br /> <br />10. Demand below the Yellow Jacket Diversion Dam1 of senior water rights. <br /> <br />11. Minimum fish flow requirements below the yellow Jacket Div~rsion Dam. <br /> <br />12. Required flow below Yellow Jacket Diversion Dam. The larger of Column <br /> <br />10 or 11. <br /> <br />13. Increase in Bypass required at Yellow Jacket diversion dam, computed by com- <br /> <br />paring Column 12 with Column 44 of the U.S.B.R. project operations study. <br /> <br />14. Shortages to the Yellow Jacket Project: <br /> <br />f3 <br />1. Condition A shorgates are assumed to have occurred in Condition ~ - plus: <br /> <br />Q. Increased shortages are assumed to occur at anytime an increased bypass <br /> <br />.,....;Jr. <br /> <br />was required unless: <br /> <br />3. The shortages could have been made up by reducing spills occurring in <br /> <br />Condition A of U.S.B.R. project operation studies. In determining <br /> <br />whether spills would have reduced shortages, physical water supply was <br /> <br />taken into account as well as storage in the Lost Park and Ripple Reser- <br /> <br />voirs and stream gains between the reservoir and the diversion dam~ <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />White River below diversion dam: <br />adjusted for Column 13. <br /> <br />Column 44, U.S.B.R. operation studies <br /> <br />"- <br />'. <br /> <br />17. Remaining surplus water in the South Fork: Equals Column 6 or the surplus <br /> <br />above the main stream demands below the South Fork. <br /> <br />18. Water supply available to Rocky Mountain Power Company. 1964 filings on the <br />South Fork: Equals 22.9% of the flow of the South Fork at the Buford gaging <br />Station. <br />"..;;.::/. 20. Shortage to Rocky Mountain Power Co. 1964 filings: Column 18 minus Colwnn 19. <br /> <br />21. Total Shortage to Rocky Mountain Power Company water rights, Column 5 plus < <br /> <br />Column 20. <br /> <br />2- <br />~- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.