WSP07064

• File Number: 8200.765
• Description: White River General
• State: CO
• Basin: Yampa/White
• Water Division: 6
• Date: 1/1/1966
• Author: Unknown
• Title: White River Water Supply Studies - 1966 - 1975
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

~:",;~;,..,-t~J
'-.i .' ,"' ,.I -

COLUMN EXPLANATION FOR WHITE RIVER OPERATIONS STUDY

CONDITION B

Column No.

1. Demand below South Fork: from Column 17 of the U.S.B.R. "White River

Operation Study". This demand was computed by accounting for diversions,

returns and accretions between the "below Meeker gage" and the below the

South Fork of the White River. The demand below the "Below Meeker Gage"

was determined by the Bureau of Reclamation as being the demand between

Lower Powell Park and Piceance Creek. and was found to be a maximum of 25 c.f.s.

The ditches that are active in that section of the river are as follows:

Innes & Reynolds

16.90 c.f.s.

E. H. Imes

9.21 c.f.s.

-'"

G. S. Witler

7.00 c.f.~.

Hayes

1.00 c.f.s.

McDowell

6.82 c.f.s.

Calhoun

3.24 c.f.s.

Sandy

.47 c.f.s.

44.64 c.f. s.

2. Historic flow of the South Fork:

Column 19 of the U.S.B.R. study.

"-
,

3; Depletions by the Piceance Pipeline and the Wheeler Philips Reservoir:

from Column 20, U.S.B.R. Study.

4. Depletions by the Rocky Mountain Power Company's works filed on 1957:

Estimated to be 39.6% of the Measured flow of the South Fork at Buford
C ,;...."
less 10~ for fish flows.

-I

."'.,

5. Shortages to Rocky Mountain Power Company's 57 filings.

,

--