My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07057
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:25:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 of 2, Pages IX-34 to Appendix
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />J1 .."\ r. ,... <br />"tuU\J <br /> <br />c. Impacts Associated with the Three Methods of Constructing <br />Granite Siphon <br /> <br />The most economical method of constructing the Granite Siphon <br />is cut and cover construction of a buried conduit (Plan A). <br />This would require vegetative clearing for the entire length <br />of the siphon possibly up to 100 feet in width. No access road <br />construction would be permitted, and the contractor could use <br />the Granite Adit construction campsite for his construction <br />camp. All topsoil could be stockpiled and spread over the area <br />excavated for construction of the conduit to facilitate revege- <br />tation of the area. Trees and native or adapted grasses could <br />be used to revegetate the entire disturbed area. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Another method of constructing the siphon is to construct a <br />slant drilled hole and tunnel on each side of the valley and <br />a buried conduit across the bottom of the Fryingpan River <br />Valley (Plan B). This construction would require clearing of <br />up to 100 feet in width for construction of buried conduit and <br />the tunnel portal areas and partial clearing for possibly 20 <br />to 50 feet in width for construction of a tramway or other <br />type of access from Granite Adit to Granite Diversion. This <br />construction would require an area for tunnel muck disposal. <br />A waste water treatment system at tunnel portals would be <br />provided if water is encountered in the very short tunnels. All <br />of the cleared areas except the tunnel muck disposal areas <br />could be revegetated with trees and native or adapted grasses <br />within a relatively ,short period of time. Topsoil would be <br />placed on the tunnel muck disposal areas to facilitate revege- <br />tation. This is the most expensive method of constructing the <br />siphon and is about 270 percent of the cost of the cut and cover <br />burial conduit method of construction. <br /> <br />The third method to construct the siphon is to construct a <br />slant drilled hole and tunnel on the south side of the <br />Fryingpan River Valley and cut and cover conduit across the <br />bottom and the north side of the river valley (Plan C). This <br />construction would require clearing of up to 100 feet in width <br />for construction of the buried conduit and the tunnel portal <br />areas and partial clearing for possibly 20 to 50 feet in width <br />for construction of a tramway or other type of access from <br />Granite Adit to Granite Diversion. This construction would <br />require an area for tunnel muck disposal. A waste water <br />treatment system would be provided near the tunnel portal if <br />needed. All of the cleared areas could be revegetated with <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IX-38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.