Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />9~ <br /> <br />~ <br />it <br />~~ <br /> <br />'TI <br />"1 <br />ie. <br /> <br />~j:-! <br />iii, <br />,~+l <br />,5 ~ <br /> <br />It; <br />",' <br />~~J;{. <br />w'" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I~ <br />~ <br />\l <br />. <br />I' <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />~ <br />i <br />I <br />I; <br />. ~,; <br />! ~, <br />I;, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />';l <br />-? <br /> <br />\: <br />{ <br /> <br />"- <br />~ <br /> <br />,\I <br /> <br />~'"~--~',~.-' ....,.-.-. -' ~ '';'>.'' <br /> <br /> <br />..-~ <br />co <br />,," <br />C'J <br /> <br />The results are good =op production in part of the area, <br />but waterlogging and high nonbeneficial consumptive use of <br />water in rrost of the area. Furthennore the soils in SOll'e <br />areas have become alkaline and the ground-water has became <br />highly mineralized because of the concentration of salts <br />by evapotranspiration. A major part of the valley south <br />and west of Alarrosa likewise is waterlogged, suffering <br />fran an abundance of water and poor drainage." <br /> <br /> <br />(:-;.., <br /> <br />," " <br />~. <br /> <br />Water loss to phreatophytes is high in p:>orly drained portions and <br />along sane irrigation canals. (Phreatophytes are discussed under <br />Study Item 10.) Irrproved drainage systems with adequate outlets <br />and water level control facilities would benefit large areas in <br />the Valley. (This need is discussed under Study Items 5 and 6.) <br /> <br />PR03RAM OF STUDY - STUDY ITEMS <br /> <br />This part of the report covers each of the 13 individual items of <br />study listed in the agreement between SCS and the Four Corners <br />Regional Corrmission. These items were included in a work schedule <br />plan prepared April 9, 1969 as required by the agreerrent and have <br />been follCMed throughout the study. <br /> <br />Data for study i tens 1 through 4 were collected fran data sheets <br />prepared by individual i=igation ditch and drainage organizations <br />on a voluntary basis. Of 755 i=igation systems in the study area, <br />155 returned corrg:>leted data sheets. The 155 responses represent <br />69 percent of the water delivered fran stream rights in the study <br />area in 1968. No attenpt was made to expand the data for the <br />i=igation systems which did not return data sheets. The figures, <br />therefore, represent finn, anticipated work. The sUj:porting data <br />sheets were assigned index numbers and are on file in the SCS <br />office in M::>nte Vista, Colorado. All costs shewn in this report <br />and in the tables are estimates based on present prices. <br /> <br />STUDY ITEM 1 - INVESTIGATE THE POSSIBILITY OF COMBINING IRRIGA.TICN <br />CANAIS AND SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY THOSE CANAlS WHICH SHOULD BE <br />COMBINED. <br /> <br />Table 1 lists six groups of canal systems, pJrtions of which could <br />be physically <Xl1lbined to save water. (Map-3, I=igation Canals <br />that Should be CorrtJined, ShCMS their locations.) Interest is <br />particularly high for canbining sections of the Morganville, <br />Flintham, and Scandinavian ditches. While it is physically <br />possible to combine sections of many other canal systems, they <br />have not been listed due to lack of interest and opposition on <br />the part of the canal ewners. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />