Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~'J:.:t.,-__;c,;'::, "-_.,c_>...:._.-.~<~"-,,!<.,,,-,O'}, <br /> <br />,k <br /> <br />j'; <br /> <br />& <br /> <br /> <br />t <br />, ,.<, <br />I -V <br /> <br />~~ <br />f-' <br /> <br />:~ <br />1 <br /> <br />< <br />J <br />J <br />:~ <br />, <br /> <br />I ~j <br />:~~ <br />..;: <br />" <br />:~' <br />, <br /> <br />o <br />',0 <br />~ <br />CJ <br /> <br />t'::-" <br /> <br />.. ~, <br />....-.', <br /> <br />,r <br /> <br />:J <br />oj <br /> <br />,- <br />, <br /> <br />".,[2,."..""",,,",7 "'...'o''_. <br /> <br /> <br />The area generally north of the Rio Grande River is a closed basin <br />with no return of surface flCM to the Rio Grande River. Large <br />anounts of water diverted into this area gradually percolate to <br />the sump area in the eastern part of the Valley. If this water <br />could retUIn to the river, TIU1Ch of the cJamstream shortages would <br />be eased. 'fue Bureau of Reclamation 's prq:>esed Closed Basin <br />project would perfom this function. <br /> <br />Stream charmels through lIUlch of the San Luis Valley are small, <br />not well entrenched, and as a result, crooked. 'fuis results in <br />inadequate capacities for the streamE1CM, poor drainage outlets, <br />and loss of water to phreatoprwtes. (Charmel irrproverrent needs <br />are discussed under study Item 9.) <br /> <br />Drainage problems of the San Luis Valley, particularly the closed <br />basin, are discussed in a recent Geological Survey report y. <br /> <br />"The depth to water in the valley is less than 12 feet <br />except along the edges and in IlOSt of Costilla ColIDty... <br /> <br />A large network of irrigation canals was built in 1880-90 <br />to irrigate lands in the eastern and_ central parts of the <br />closed basin. By 1915 llOSt of the area around M:lsca and <br />Hooper became waterlogged because of this irrigation. <br />Drainage systems ronstructed between 1911 and 1921 to <br />reclaim waterlogged lands alleviated sone of the problems <br />but created waterlogging in areas dcMngradient. Water- <br />logging in other areas is caused by subirrigation because <br />the water table is intentionally raised to the plant root <br />zone. The practice rontinues because it is oonsidered <br />locally to be essential to successful g~ of crops..." <br /> <br />"Ground-water withdralllal for recent years (1962-1967) <br />averaged about 1,100,000 acre-feet per year. withdralllal <br />by large capacity irrigation wells was about 800,000 acre- <br />feet per year.. . and withdralllal by small capacity wells <br />tapping the ronfined aoquifer was 300,000 acre-feet per <br />year. In 1967 the unconfined aoquifer acoounted for 71 <br />percent of the ground-water withdrawn fran large capacity <br />wells. A large nurrt>er of small capacity oonfined wells <br />rontinue to flON throughout the year and an estimated <br />150,000 acre-feet per year might be ronsidered waste <br />because it does not contribute to crop production. In <br />fact it causes additional waterlogging... n <br /> <br />"Surface water use has resulted in the waterlogging of a <br />large part of the valley. The valley-fill deposits in the <br />northern part of the valley are filled with water fran the <br />tributaIy watersheds and f:rom the Rio Grande diversions. <br /> <br />y See reference 27 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />