Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Resource <br />Local economy <br /> <br />Housing <br /> <br />Population <br /> <br />Services <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Energy <br /> <br />Scenery <br /> <br />Air and noise <br /> <br />Water <br /> <br />Vegetation <br /> <br />Wildlife <br /> <br />Fish <br />Endangered species <br /> <br />Cultural resources <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />SUMMARY (Continued) <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No <br />Unkn~n <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />Yes <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />Recreation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Summary Table 4 <br />Short- and long-term effects <br />resulting from recommended plan <br />Short- Long- Relationship of short-term <br />term term use of environment and <br />effects effects long-term productivity <br />Yes Yes Salaries totaling $883,000 during construction <br />and $112,000 annually during operation of the <br />unit would be spent in area and have a posi- <br />tive effect on the local economy. <br />During the peak of construction, 26 construc- <br />tion people would occupy housing, including <br />any local workers. Four units, now vacant, <br />would be occupied by operation and maintenance <br />personnel and their families. <br />About 26 workers would be needed during the <br />peak construction period; 21 of these workers <br />would likely be local residents. Only four <br />operation and maintenance workers and their <br />families would be associated with the unit <br />over the long term. <br />The construction force or operation and main- <br />tenance workers and their families would have <br />a negligible effect on services. <br />The energy for vehicles and machinery would be <br />short- and long-term commitments of resources. <br />Visual effects would exist for the life of the <br />unit, or longer, until facilities were removed <br />and the landscape restored. <br />These qualities would both degrade slightly <br />but would remain within legal standards. <br />The unit would remove 20,900 tons of salt and <br />2.75 cis (about 2,000 acre-feet/year) of water <br />and store it in the Coconino Sandstone. <br />Vegetation on 25 acres would be lost to unit <br />facilities construction; landscaping after <br />construction would offset these losses. Post- <br />construction monitoring would identify the <br />long-term effects. <br />During construction, short-term decreases of <br />the local population of small mammals and <br />birds would occur and some small terrestrial <br />animals would be lost. Long-term populations <br />would not be affected. <br />No effects. <br />The Wright fishhook cactus is being further <br />evaluated to eliminate effects from construc- <br />tion of facilities and roads. <br />The unit would not disturb any significant <br />cultural resources. <br />No effects. <br /> <br />002329 <br /> <br />S-21 <br />