Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY (Continued) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cultural resources <br /> <br />Under the no-action alternative, no unit-related cultural resources <br />effects would occur. Construction of the powerlines under the recom- <br />mended plan would only slightly affect the four sites in the unit area <br />which are eligible for the National Register for Historic Places, and no <br />known cultural resource features or structures would be damaged. However, <br />since the four eligible sites do contain subsurface remains in some areas, <br />a professional archeologist would monitor construction of the powerlines <br />through these areas and sensitive site areas would be marked for avoid- <br />ance. If unknown subsurface remains were detected by this monitoring, <br />work would stop and the procedures outlined in 36 CFR 800 for construc- <br />tion discoveries would be followed, including Section 106 consultation <br />with the Utah State Historic Preservation Officer (USHPO) and the Advi- <br />sory Council on Historic Preservation. The USHPO concurs in these <br />findings of eligibility and no adverse effect. <br /> <br />Although four sites potentially eligible for the National Register <br />were found, only minimal impacts to these cultural resources are pre- <br />dicted. The four sites would remain substantially intact after the end <br />of construction. No paleontological studies were conducted. If, during <br />construction, fossils or similar resources were unearthed, construction <br />would be stopped until the finds were preserved or properly documented. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Recreation <br /> <br />Under the no-action alternative, no unit-related effects would occur. <br />Under the recommended plan, a 2.75-cfs flow reduction in either the Dirty <br />Devil River or Muddy Creek would not adversely affect river recreation <br />because this reduction is small compared to the larger flows used for <br />rafting and innertubing. Recreation might be improved because of better <br />access, though public access to approximately 25 acres would be restricted <br />because of unit facilities. Reclamation concluded, in coordination with <br />the BLM, that no significant adverse effects on recreation would occur <br />nor would the unit affect any of the BLM-proposed wilderness areas. <br /> <br />Short- and long-term environmental effects <br /> <br />The table on the following page shows the short-term and long-term <br />effects of the unit on various resources. The short-term effects would <br />last for the 3 years of construction; the long-term effects would be for <br />the projected life of the unit, 50 years. <br /> <br />Basis for Plan Selection <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The deep-well injection alternative was selected as the recommended <br />plan for the following reasons: (1) it is the only plan passing the four <br />tests of viability, (2) it is acceptable to the public, (3) it would <br />reduce salinity in the Colorado River by 20,900 tons annually at a cost- <br />effective rate of $97 per ton of salt removed, and (4) it would have no <br />net significant adverse environmental effects on the area. The cost <br /> <br />S-20 <br /> <br />002328 <br />