My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06782
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06782
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:21 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.C
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/5/1998
Title
The Grand Canyon Monitoring & Research Center Fiscal Year 2000-2004 Monitoring & Research Strategic Plan (pp 1-87)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />29 <br /> <br />716 review process, and the inclusion of external (Le., outside GCMRC) reviewers in the <br />717 scientific peer review process. <br />718 In general, following approval by the AMWG of the strategic plan, an annual <br />719 monitoring and research program will be completed and approved each year in April. After <br />720 approval of the annual monitoring and research plan, RFPs will be issued. Awards will be <br />721 made on the basis of the results of peer review, along with the program manager's evaluation <br />722 of project relevance, and technical contracting requirements. <br />723 GCMRC's peer review guidelines are consistent with the "U.S. Department of the <br />724 Interior Guidelines for Scientific Peer Review of Research" issued by the Secretary of <br />725 Interior. These include: <br />726 . Objectivity and independence of reviews. <br />727 . Reviews conducted by true scientific peers, as judged by demonstrable scientific <br />728 achievements. <br />729 . Independence of peer reviewers. <br />730 . Provision of constructive feedback to the investigator. <br />731 . Anonymity for peer reviewers, unless waived. <br />732 In addition, the effectiveness of GCMRC's peer review process will undergo periodic <br />733 evaluation by SAB, NRC, etc. <br />734 <br />735 Science Advisory Board (SAD ) <br />736 To ensure that the long-term monitoring and research activities initiated by GCMRC <br />737 are unbiased and objective, scientifically sound, and focused on the most important issues, <br />738 an independent Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) will be established to advise GCMRC on <br />739 the coordination and planning of its monitoring and research programs, and to review the <br />740 results of GCMRC's monitoring and research programs. The SAB is synonymous with one <br />741 of the Independent Review Panels (IRPs) specified in the GCDEIS (DOl, 1995). The SAB <br />742 will be an advisory, not a decision-making body, but both the GCMRC and the AMWG <br />743 should be prepared to explain why it has accepted or rejected advice provided by the SAB. <br /> <br />; <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />I: <br /> <br />;1 <br />;~ <br />.' <br /> <br />''l"' <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />:;.i <br /> <br />:-.i: <br /> <br />. <br />" <br />l <br />-::.' <br />.... <br /> <br />November S, 1998 <br />SecoDd DntI - Do Not Cite, Photocopy. or DIstrIbute <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.