Laserfiche WebLink
<br />w <br />(.J1 <br />0.) <br />~ <br /> <br />(b) Costs per ton of salt removed from <br /> <br />the discharge for each plan alter- <br /> <br />native. <br /> <br />(e) Capability of minimizing salinity <br /> <br />discharge. <br /> <br />(3) With re<jard to both points, one and two <br /> <br />above, the compatibility of state water <br /> <br />laws with either the complete elimina- <br /> <br />tion of a salt discharge or any plan <br /> <br />for minimizing a salt dischac<je. <br /> <br />(4) The no-salt discharge requirement .nay <br /> <br />be waived in those cases where the salt <br /> <br />load reaching the main stem of the <br /> <br />Colorado River is less than one ton per <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br /> <br />day or 350 tons per year, whichever is <br /> <br />less. Evaluation will be made on a <br /> <br />case-by-case basis. <br /> <br />B. Existing Facilities <br />1. The permitting authority may permit the dis- <br /> <br />charge of salt upon a satisfactory demonstration <br />by the permittee that it is not practicable to <br /> <br />prevent the discharge of all salt from an <br /> <br />existing facility. <br />2. The demonstration by the applicant must include <br /> <br />information, in addition to that required under <br /> <br />Section I, ~, 1, b; the following factors <br /> <br />relating to the potential discharge: <br />