Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />c::) <br />'-::J <br />.... <br />'.') <br />N <br />'""" <br /> <br />" Most estimates of future demands for water and wat('r- <br />related activities have been based 011 a single projpetion <br />of the important variables affecting water requirements. <br />Future water demands will depend, however, on a numb,,!' <br />of variables, including: (1) population, (2) the rate of <br />national income growth. (3) per capita energy consumptioll, <br />(4) factors affecting demands for food and fiber for <br />domestic use and for export, . . ., (5) government <br />programs dealing with resource development and distri- <br />bution, such as environmental protection gonls and crop <br />price support programs, (6) tile rate of technological <br />change, (7) recreational water uses, and (8) the price <br />of water to the various users. Any attempt to anticipate <br />and identify future water resource problems should <br />conside'r all of these and other factors which will in- <br />fluence water demands. It is difficult, if not impossible, <br />to attach values to or make a single 'best' estimate for <br />many of these variables 50, 30, 20, or even 10 years <br />in the future, and it is impossible to assign a single value <br />or 'best' estimate to these same variables at some future <br />, time period. Therefore, in formulating national water <br />policy the Nation should not be bound by any particular <br />projection or forecast of the future. Rather, the probll'ms <br />of meeting future water requirements should be investigated <br />in terms of a range of possible outcomes or alternative <br />futures. " (Emphasis added.) <br /> <br /> <br />Analysis indicates that many of the major recommendations <br />in the NWC's Final Report of June 1973, indeed have crystallized <br />into firm national policy. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Reanalysis and Strengthening of Socioeconomic Projections. <br /> <br />The staff believes that socioeconomic projections, especially <br />the population projection, presented on pages 76- 78 of the <br />captioned draft Assessment Report, should be reexamined in <br />the light of the data released by the Bureau of the Census on or <br />about December 11, 1975, regarding U. S. population shifts during <br />the past five years. (See the Census Bureau's publication <br />Series P-25, No. 615, "Population Estimates and Projections"). <br />The gradual but massive shift of the American population nway <br />from the industrialized North and toward the South and West, <br />documented by the 1970 census, has accelerated greatly in the <br />last five years. Some of the eight states in the Arkansas- White- <br />Red River Basins grew at rates which are far greater than the <br />national average population growth rate of 4.8 percent: <br /> <br />179 <br />