|
<br />Arizona
<br />Colorado $
<br />New Mexico.
<br />Utah
<br />Total With McElmo
<br />Total Withoul McElmo
<br />
<br />Arizona.
<br />Colorado
<br />New Mexico
<br />Utah
<br />Total With McElmo
<br />Total Without McElmo
<br />
<br />Arizona
<br />Colorado
<br />New Mexico
<br />Utah
<br />Total With McElmo
<br />Total Wthout McElmo
<br />
<br />Average Difference
<br />Percent Difference
<br />Maximum Difference
<br />Standard Deviation
<br />
<br />Average Difference
<br />Percent Difference
<br />Maximum Difference
<br />Standard Deviation
<br />
<br />SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN
<br />
<br />6/17/99
<br />
<br />SUMMARY OF OEPLETIONS BY MODEL RUN, STATE, AND DEPLETION TYPE
<br />Non.lrrigation Depletions
<br />
<br />Total Depletions
<br />
<br />New Rul~s With,T9L Calibratio~ I
<br />16 (J1.I"70 /s _" ''''~ <t:t.
<br />
<br />Irrigaled
<br />Acres
<br />
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />tG~ TJ')
<br />
<br />Natural Flow Study
<br />
<br />4,183 4,596 4,596 0 9.701 9.701 0 14.297 14,297 0
<br />170.423 267.848 235,325 32,522 16,903 16,903 0 284,751 252,228 32.522
<br />62,694 143,009 143.009 0 44.502 44.502 0 187,511 187,511 0
<br />2,955 5,067 5,067 0 6,587 6.587 0 11,654 11.654 0
<br />240,255 420.521 387.998 32,522 77,692 77.692 0 498,213 465,690 32,522
<br />204.602 354,513 330.809 23,704 73,358 73,358 0 427,871 404,167 23,704
<br />
<br />Calibration Model Run
<br />
<br />4,183 4.596 4.596 0 9,701 9.701 0 14,297 14,297 0
<br />170.423 268.479 237,197 31.282 16.611 15,482 1,129 285,090 252,679 32.411
<br />62,694 142.754 142,152 602 44,502 44.495 6 187.256 186,648 608
<br />2,955 5.067 5,067 0 6,587 6,587 0 11,654 11,654 0
<br />240,255 420,897 389.013 31,884 77,400 76.265 1,135 498,297 465,278 33.019
<br />204,602 354,925 327,383 27,542 73,045 72,045 1,000 427,970 399.428 28.542
<br />
<br />Total Difference - Natural Flow minus Calibration
<br />
<br />Shortages Depletions
<br />% Difference % Difference
<br />
<br />0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
<br />0 (631) (1,872) 1241 292 1421 .1129 -339 -451 112 0.34 -0.18
<br />0 255 857 -602 0 6 .6 255 863 .608 100.00 0.46
<br />0 0 0 0 .0 -0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
<br />0 (376) (1,015) 638 292 1,427 (1,135) (84) 412 (497) -1.53 009
<br />0 (412) 3,426 (3,838) 312 1,313 (1,000) (99) 4,739 (4,838) -20.41 117
<br />
<br />Monthly Basin Wide Shortage StatIstics - Total With McElmo
<br />Oct Nov Dee Jan Feb
<br />
<br />Jun
<br />
<br />Jul
<br />
<br />Sep
<br />
<br />Annual
<br />
<br />Mar
<br />
<br />Apr
<br />
<br />May
<br />
<br />AU9
<br />
<br />846 (25) (113) (72) (36) (81) (961) (627) (1,099) (1.405) 932 2,144 496)
<br />36.21 (569.32) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 (223,451.64) (59.24) (32.69) (17.58) 8.92 29.25 ( (1.53) J
<br />4,108 36 (6) (4) (5) (6) (9) 3,696 7.574 9,605 11.070 6.430 3~
<br />1.746 46 69 48 33 227 1.441 1,777 3.837 5.077 4,780 2.962 14,096
<br />
<br />Monthly Basin Wide Shortage Statistics - Total Without McElmo
<br />Oct Nov Dee Jan Feb
<br />
<br />Jun
<br />
<br />Jul
<br />
<br />Sep
<br />
<br />Mar
<br />
<br />Apr
<br />
<br />May
<br />
<br />AU9
<br />
<br />Annual
<br />
<br />508 (25) (30) (23) (36) (40) (480) (739) (1,665) (2.728) (636) lM6 (4,838)
<br />30.00 (1.716.80) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 54,636.56 (98.99) (76.01) (47.48) (8.11) 19.27 20.41) 1
<br />2.991 (5) (6) (4) (5) (8) (19) 1,715 3,150 4,049 7,575 3,735 16.827
<br />1,494 34 25 22 32 60 770 1,307 2,550 3.676 3,453 2.862 9.749
<br />
<br />$ Colorado ideal and realized irrigation depletion includes computed sprinkler evaporation as a function of depletion divided by efficiency.
<br />Actual natural flow irrigation depletion is 238,084 acre-feet.
<br />
<br />. No shortages were applied in New Mexico in natural flow analysis. Realized and ideal computed depletion includes
<br />computed sprinkler evaporation as a function of depletion divided by efficiency.
<br />Actual natural flow irrigation depletion is 143,819 acre.feet.
<br />
|