|
<br />~
<br />
<br />Arizona
<br />Colorado $
<br />New Mexico ~
<br />Utah
<br />Total \^lith McElmo
<br />T atal Without McElmo
<br />
<br />Arizona
<br />CtJln1adtJ
<br />New Mexico
<br />Utah
<br />Total With McElmo
<br />Total Without McElmo
<br />
<br />Anzona
<br />Colorado
<br />New Mexico
<br />Utah
<br />Tatar With McErmo
<br />T alaI Withoul McElmo
<br />
<br />Average Difference
<br />Percent Difference
<br />Maximum Difference
<br />Standard Deviation
<br />
<br />Average Difference
<br />Percent Difference
<br />Maximum Difference
<br />Standard Deviation
<br />
<br />SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN
<br />
<br />6/17/99
<br />
<br />SUMMARY OF DEPLETIOKS BY MODEL RUK, STATE, AKD DEPLETIOK TYPE
<br />
<br />New Rules With A~justed Calibration
<br />
<br />Irrigaled
<br />Acres
<br />
<br />
<br />9G'i.'rO')
<br />
<br />Non-Irrigation Depletions
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Shortage Ideal
<br />(\\later Years 1970-1993)
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />Natural Flow Study
<br />
<br />4.163 4,596 4,596 0 9,701 9,701 0 14.297 14,297 0
<br />170,423 267.848 235,325 32,522 16.903 16,903 0 284,751 252,228 32,522
<br />62.694 143,009 143,009 0 44,502 44.502 0 187.511 187.511 0
<br />2,955 5.067 5,067 0 6,587 6,587 0 11,654 11,654 0
<br />240,255 420,521 387,998 32.522 77 ,692 77 ,692 0 498,213 465,690 32.522
<br />204.602 354,513 330,809 23,704 73,358 73.358 0 427,871 4U4,167 23.704
<br />
<br />Calibration Model Run
<br />
<br />4,183 4,596 4,596 0 9,701 9,701 0 14,297 14,297 0
<br />110.,423 266,479- 207,950 00,500 IS,SH 15.520 1,088 265,090 250,473 3"\,€l'\1
<br />62,694 142,754 142,152 602 44.502 44.495 6 '\ 87,256 166.648 606
<br />2,955 5,067 5,067 0 6,587 6.587 0 11,654 11,654 0
<br />240.255 420.897 389.765 31.132 77,400 76,306 1,094 498.297 466,071 32,226
<br />204.602 354,925 328,136 26,790 73,045 72,086 959 427,970 400,221 27,749
<br />
<br />Total Difference - Natural Flow mInus Calibration
<br />
<br />Shortages Depletions
<br />% Difference % Difference
<br />
<br />0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
<br />0 (631) (2.624) 1993 292 1380 -1088 -339 .1245 905 2.78 -049
<br />0 255 657 -602 0 6 -6 255 863 -608 100.00 0.46
<br />0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
<br />0 (376) (1,767) 1.391 292 1.386 (1,094) (84) (381) 297 0,91 .0.08
<br />0 (412) 2,674 (3,086) 312 1,272 (959) (99) 3,945 (4,045) -17.08 098
<br />
<br />MOAthly Basin Wide Shortage Statistics - Total W1th McElmo
<br />Oct Nov Dee Jan Feb
<br />
<br />Mar
<br />
<br />Apr
<br />
<br />May
<br />
<br />Jun
<br />
<br />Jul
<br />
<br />Aug
<br />
<br />sep
<br />
<br />Annual
<br />
<br />859 (25) (113) (72) (36) (81) (956) (551) (925) (1,060) 1.051 2.208 -=
<br />36.78 (569.32) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 (222,849.82) (52.10) (27.51) (13.27) 10.06 30.13 / 0.91 ')
<br />4,108 36 (6) (4) (5) (8) (9) 3,896 7,574 9.886 11,070 6,430 30,Tff
<br />1,740 46 69 48 33 227 1,437 1.724 3,748 5,033 4.727 2,913 13.955
<br />
<br />Monthty Basin Witla Shortaga S\at\s\iea - 'To\a\ Without McE\mo
<br />Del Nav Dee Jan Feb
<br />
<br />Apr
<br />
<br />May
<br />
<br />Mar
<br />
<br />Jun
<br />
<br />Jul
<br />
<br />AU9
<br />
<br />Sep
<br />
<br />Annual
<br />
<br />522 (25) (30) (23) (36) (40) (478) (664) (1,491) (2.384) (517) 1,121 (4,045)
<br />30.79 (1.716.80) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 54.342.16 (88.87) (68.07) (41,48) (6.60) 20,45 r (17.06)
<br />2.991 (5) (6) (4) (5) (8) (19) 1,827 3.150 4.330 7.575 3,735 1T,i13
<br />1,487 34 25 22 32 60 769 1,247 2,441 3.666 3,366 2.810 9,523
<br />
<br />J
<br />
<br />$ Colorado Ideal and realized irrigation depletion includes computed sprinkler evaporation as a functIOn of depletion divided by efficiency.
<br />Actual natural flow irrigation depletion is 236,064 8Cle.feet.
<br />
<br />. No shortages were applied in New Mexico in nalural flow analysis. Realized and ideal computed depletion includes
<br />computed sprink.ler evaporation as a function of depletion divided by efficiency.
<br />Actual natural flow irrigation depletion is 143,819 acre-feet.
<br />
|