|
<br />Anzona
<br />Colorado $
<br />New MexIco.
<br />Utah
<br />TotalVVith McElmo
<br />T olal VVithout McElmo
<br />
<br />Ariz.ona
<br />Colorado
<br />New MexIco
<br />Utah
<br />Total With McElmo
<br />TotalVVithout McElmo
<br />
<br />Arizona
<br />Colorado
<br />New Mexico
<br />Utah
<br />Total With McElmo
<br />T olal Without McElmo
<br />
<br />Average Difference
<br />Percent Difference
<br />Maximum Difference
<br />Standard Deviation
<br />
<br />Average Difference
<br />Percent Difference
<br />Maximum Difference
<br />Slandard Deviation
<br />
<br />SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN
<br />
<br />6/18/99
<br />
<br />SUMMARY OF DEPLETIONS BY MODEL RUN, STATE, AND DEPLETION TYPE
<br />
<br />Revised Diversion Rules TCL Calibration
<br />
<br />Irrigated
<br />Acres
<br />
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />
<br />Total Depletions
<br />
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />C .. .- - ,) )
<br />ob~l'J:
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Ideal
<br />(Water Years 1970-1993)
<br />
<br />Shortage
<br />
<br />Natural Flow Study
<br />
<br />4,183 4.596 4,596 0 9,701 9,701 0 14,297 14,297 0
<br />170,423 267,848 235.325 32,522 16,903 16,903 0 284,751 252,228 32.522
<br />62,694 143,009 143,009 0 44.502 44.502 0 187,511 187.511 0
<br />2.955 5.067 5,067 0 6.587 6.587 0 11.654 11,654 0
<br />240,255 420,521 387,998 32.522 77,892 77 .692 0 498.213 465.690 32.522
<br />204,602 354,513 330.809 23,704 73.358 73.358 0 427,871 404,167 23.704
<br />
<br />Calibration Model Run
<br />
<br />4,183 4,596 4,596 0 9,701 9.701 0 14.297 14,297 0
<br />170,423 268.479 237.079 31.401 16.611 15.515 1,096 285.090 252,594 32,496
<br />62.694 142,755 142.152 602 44,502 44.495 6 187.256 186,648 608
<br />2,955 5.067 5,067 0 6,587 6,587 0 11,654 11.654 0
<br />240,255 420.897 388.894 32.003 77,400 76,298 1,102 498,297 465,192 33,105
<br />204,602 354,925 327,265 27,661 73,045 72,078 967 427.970 399.342 28.628
<br />
<br />Total Difference - Natural Flow minus Calibrallon
<br />
<br />Shortages Depletions
<br />'% Difference % Difference
<br />
<br />0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
<br />0 (631) (1.753) 1122 292 1388 -1096 .339 .365 26 0.08 .0.14
<br />0 255 857 -<l02 0 6 .6 255 863 -<l08 10000 0,46
<br />0 0 0 0 -0 -0 0 0 0 0 000 0.00
<br />0 (376) (896) 520 292 1.394 (1.102) (84) 498 (582) -1.79 0.11
<br />0 (412) 3.545 (3,957) 312 1.280 (967) (99) 4.825 (4,924) .20.77 1.19
<br />
<br />Monthly Basin Wide Shortage Statistics a Total With McElmo
<br />Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
<br />
<br />Mar
<br />
<br />Apr
<br />
<br />May
<br />
<br />Jun
<br />
<br />AU9
<br />
<br />Sep
<br />
<br />Annual
<br />
<br />Jul
<br />
<br />761 (20) (110) (67) (25) (81) (953) (540) (1.132) (1.358) 799 2.144 ..156.2
<br />32.58, (456.72) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 (221.728.06) (51.02) (33.66) (17.00) 765 29.25 ( (1.79) )
<br />3,957 47 (6) (4) (5) (8) (9) 3.896 7,574 9,603 11,070 6,430 J4."UU
<br />1,671 37 67 45 19 227 1.428 1,667 3,779 5,069 4.782 2,833 14,346
<br />
<br />Monthly Basin Wide Shortage Statistics - Total Without McElmo
<br />Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
<br />
<br />Mar
<br />
<br />Apr
<br />
<br />May
<br />
<br />Jun
<br />
<br />Jul
<br />
<br />AU9
<br />
<br />Sep
<br />
<br />Annual
<br />
<br />424 (20) (27) (18) (25) (40) (473) (652) (1.698) (2,682) (769) 1.056 (4,924)
<br />25.00 (1.379.00) 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 53.793.33 (87.34) (77.50) (46.67) (9.80) 19.27 '( (20.77) ")
<br />2.840 (5) (6) (4) (5) (8) (19) 1.827 3,150 4,048 7,575 3.721 10;903
<br />1.404 23 18 16 18 60 766 1,180 2,5-49 3,7-43 3,447 2,676 9.954
<br />
<br />$ Colorado ideal and realized irrigation depletion includes computed sprinkler evaporation as a function of depletion divided by efficiency.
<br />Actual natural flow irrigation depletion is 238,084 acre.feet.
<br />
<br />. No shortages were applied in New Mexico in natural flow analysis. Realized and ideal computed depletion includes
<br />computed sprinkler evaporation as.a function of depletion divided by efficiency.
<br />Actual natural flow inigation depletion is 143,819 acre-feet.
<br />
|