Laserfiche WebLink
<br />({~}1 <br /> <br />flf)183t; <br /> <br />i~~t) <br /> <br />2. Other legislators have been c;ontacted as to their <br />views, but no replies have b'Ten received yet. <br /> <br />3. Legislators actively interested in water would <br />basically be interested in the consideration of <br />the previously discussed aspects which affect <br />their districts. <br /> <br />B. State Agencies <br /> <br />1. Mr. T. W. Ten Eyck, Director of Natural Resources, <br />thinks it necessary to consider: <br /> <br />a. Water as a property right, <br /> <br />b. State involvement in water projects, <br /> <br />c. "It is useles s to plan changes without <br />significant changes in water law and perhaps <br />land use law. 11 <br /> <br />C. Lobbyists and Pressure Groups <br /> <br />1. Denver Regional Council of Governments wishes to <br />see broader investigations of the state's <br />natural resources and development and compari- <br />sons concerning water use and economics. <br /> <br />a. They specifically want to see local control <br />and decision-making maintained. <br /> <br />2. League of Women Voters of Colorado endorses the <br />concept of state-wide planning and direction in <br />water development. <br /> <br />3. Colorado Open Space Council has focused on <br />promoting land us e legislation rather than specific <br />legislation directly concerned with water. <br /> <br />4. Other individuals and groups have been contacted, <br />but feedback is slow because of the holidays. <br /> <br />5. Although radio and television do not usually cover <br />water items in depth, the newspapers will probably <br />review the publi shed plan and present editorial comments. <br /> <br />- 8 - <br />