Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~j <br /> <br />~j3~:' <br /> <br />00183) <br /> <br />E. Inter-agency cooperation varies. <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />2.__ <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />There has not been much data input from the State <br />Engineer's Office because the files of the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board contain the same in- <br />formation. <br /> <br />Al though -the -ColoradG- W ate-r -Gonser- va ti-on- B.oar.d.__ <br />does not receive entire data from different agencies, <br />the Board does receive information in reply to any <br />specific requests for it. <br /> <br />Game, fish, parks and recreation agencies have <br />been somewhat involved, but they have been too <br />busy in their OWn specific fields to devote a great <br />amount of time to water plan input. <br /> <br />Some rivalry does exist among the various agencies <br />at all levels. <br /> <br />a. This is due partly to differences in personal <br />attitudes toward the water situation in <br />Colorado. <br /> <br />b. To some extent, this is also due to personal <br />as sessments of the performances of the <br />various agencies. <br /> <br />5. Not all agencies, such as the Colorado Water <br />Quality Division, the Denver Regional Council of <br />Governments, the Denver Water Department,have <br />been contacted so far. <br /> <br />6. There are interagency committees developing input <br />for the Plan. See Appendix. <br /> <br />III. Omis sions in the Present Scope of the State Water Plan <br /> <br />A. Certain aspects are only receiving superficial attention. <br /> <br />1. Although the study will point out areas of water <br />shortage, it will not develop any specifics on water <br />augmentation through weather modification, reuse, <br />and importation. <br /> <br />6 - <br />