Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"J <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />""'" <br />foe" <br />~ <br />...:t <br /> <br />NPDIlS Permit No. CO-0042161 <br />Sa1ini~ Control Study <br /> <br />Twentymile Coal Company <br /> <br />5.0 Conclusions and Recommendatious <br /> <br />This S#inity Control Study was prepared to comply with the Regulations foc Implementation <br />of the ;Colorado River Salinity Standards through the NPDES Permit Program. These' <br />regulatipns require that treatment options be examined if a permit holder's discharge of salts ' <br />into a tHbutary of the Colorado River exceeds I ton/day or 350 tons per year. This study <br />focusedlon determining the feasibility, cost and effectiveness of three alternatives for reducing' <br />or eliminating the salt loading to Fish Creek from the discharge outfall 00 I covered under ' ' <br />Twenl}1iuleCoal Company's (fCC) current NPDES Permit CO-0042161. Outfall 001 dischl!rges <br />from a ~edimentation pond which treats water from underground mine operations via the Fish <br />Creek Bbrehole. <br /> <br />;z <br /> <br />The analysis involved characterizing the current flows, IDS concentrations, and salt loading in <br />Fish Cr~k both upstream and downstream of the discharge outfall. These "baseline" <br />conditio!).s were established using flow, IDS and specific conductance monitoring records, <br />from th~last four and one half years (April, 1990 through September; 1994) for the discharge <br />outfall, and for Fish Creek above and below the discharge. <br /> <br />Baseline i conditions on Fish Creek downstream of the discharge were compared with . the <br />estimate4 effects of three alternatives to reduce salt loading from the discharge. These <br />a1ternati~es were complete salt elimination by deep well injection (Option 1), partial salt <br />removal illy reverse osmosis (Option 2), and partial salt reduction by deep well injection. <br />(Option 3). <br /> <br />5.1 Qption 1 <br /> <br />Option I,' complete discharge elimination, results in the greatest reduction in salt loading, The <br />average 4aily salt load at the discharge outfall is estimated to be 1.83 tons/day for the <br />1990-1994 record, Complete elimination of the discharge would reduCe salt load in Fish Creek,' , <br />by 14 to ~O percent. Average IDS concentration downstream from the discharge outfall would <br />decline fr~m 781 ppm to 463 ppm. The depletion of streamflow by deep well injection may <br />require a ~urface water right, which might be difficult to obtain if water depletion results in <br />material d>unage to the quantity of water supplying a designated Alluvial V alley Floor , The <br />reduction~ in salt loads and IDS concentrations in Fish Creek would not be measurable at high <br />flows, but, would be significant during low flow. <br /> <br />The capital cost of Option I is $4,793,000 with annual operating costs of $106,000. <br /> <br />The const1')Jction of this option is technically feasible, although it is uncertain whether injection <br />well permits could be obtained and whether the Dakota Sandstone would prove suitable for_ <br />injection, <br /> <br />;;, <br /> <br />AHA Filename: \4SALCN1.DOC <br /> <br />Page 32 <br /> <br />J 1:59 AM 09129/95 <br /> <br />""""'------"- __ ~_ _ .'-_~ -'" '.L <br /> <br />A~~ <br />fl~ <br />