Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f' "'.') .:::;n <br />,,' <br /> <br />the existing main canal and lateral systems could not meet <br /> <br />these peak demands. <br /> <br />In fact, the original systems were <br /> <br />designed for a cropping pattern that required significantly <br /> <br />less peak capacity. <br /> <br />The irrigation systems now serve many additional acres of <br /> <br />land that were not contemplated when the systems were built. <br /> <br />In many cases, the main canals and laterals are not capable <br /> <br />of supplying water to these added lands and private, shal1o~ <br /> <br />wells have been drilled. <br /> <br />The original irrigation systems did not provide drainage <br /> <br />facilities to handle a rise in the ground water table. A <br /> <br />ground water mound has built up as much as 26 m since the <br /> <br />project was constructed and has created a nunber of water- <br /> <br />logged areas within the project service area. <br /> <br />As the number <br /> <br />of private wells increased, it became readily apparent that <br /> <br />there was a need to conjunctively operate the ground and <br /> <br />surface water supplies to more efficiently run the irri- <br /> <br />gation systems and provide a degree of control over the <br /> <br />ground water levels. <br /> <br />As the need for increased water demands occurred, flow rates <br /> <br />were increased in the main canals and laterals, which caused <br /> <br />severe erosion and deposition. <br /> <br />The highly erosive loessial <br /> <br />soils of the area have sloughed into the canals which <br /> <br />reduced transport capacity and increased maintenance costs. <br /> <br />-7- <br />