My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06041
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1968
Author
Unknown
Title
Report of the Water Management Technical Subcommittee - Factors Affecting Sediment Yield and Measures for the Reduction of Erosion and Sediment Yield - October 1968
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />001394 <br /> <br />- 9 - <br /> <br />Channel Erosion and Sediment Transport <br /> <br />If a stream is ephemeral, runoff in traversing the dry alluvial bed may <br />be drastically reduced by transmission losses (absorption by channel <br />alluvium). This decrease in the volume of flow results in a decreased <br />potential to move sediment. Sediment may be deposited in the streambed <br />from one or a series of relatively small flows only to be picked up and <br />moved on in a subsequent larger flow. Sediment concentrations, determined <br />from field measurements at consecutive stations, have generally been shown <br />to increase many fold for instances of no tributary inflow. Thus, although <br />water yield per unit area will decrease with increasing drainage area, the <br />sediment yield per unit area may remain nearly constant or may even increase <br />with increasing drainage area. <br /> <br />In instances of convective precipitation in a watershed with perennial flow, <br />the role of transmission losses is not as significant as in watersheds with <br />ephemeral flow, but other channel factors, such as the shape of the channel, <br />may be important. <br /> <br />For frontal storm runoff the flow durations are generally much longer than <br />for convective storms, and runoff is often generated from the entire basin. <br />In such instances, sediment removed from the land surfaces is generally <br />carried out of the area by the ru~off. Stream channel degradation and/or <br />aggradation must be considered in such cases, as well as bank scour. Because <br />many of the stream beds in the Pacific Southwest are composed of fine-grained <br />alluvium in well defined channels, the potential for sediment transport is <br />limited only by the amount and duration of runoff. Large volumes of sediment <br />may thus be moved by these frontal storms because of the longer flow durations. <br /> <br />The combination of frontal storms of long duration with high intensity and <br />limited areal-extent convective activity will generally be in the highest <br />class for sediment movement in the channels. Storms of this type generally <br />produce both the high peak flows and the long durations necessary for max- <br />imum sediment transport. <br /> <br />Sediment yield may be substantially affected by the degree of channel develop- <br />ment in a watershed. This development can be described by the channel cross <br />sections, as well as by geomorphic parameters such as drainage density, <br />channel gradients and width-depth ratio. The effect of these geomorphic <br />parameters is difficult to evaluate primarily because of the scarcity of sedi- <br />ment transport data in the Pacific Southwest. <br /> <br />If the cross section of a stream is such as to keep the flow within defined <br />banks, then the sediment from an upstream point is generally transported to <br />a downstream point without significant losses. Confinement of the flow <br />within alluvial banks can result in a high erosional capability of a flood <br />flow, especially the flows with long return periods. In most channels with <br />wide floodplains, deposition on the floodplain during floods is often sig- <br />nificant, and the transport is thus less than that for a within bank flow. <br />The effect of this transport capability can be explained in terms of tractive <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.