My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06041
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:21:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:24:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1968
Author
Unknown
Title
Report of the Water Management Technical Subcommittee - Factors Affecting Sediment Yield and Measures for the Reduction of Erosion and Sediment Yield - October 1968
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />- 8 - <br /> <br />A decline in vegetative density is not the only effect of livestock on <br />erosion and sediment yield. Studies at Badger Wash, Colorado, which is <br />underlain by Mancos shale, have indicated that sediment yield from un- <br />grazed watersheds is appreciably less than from those that are grazed. <br />This difference is attributed to absence of soil trampling in the ungrazed <br />areas since the density of vegetation has not noticeably changed since ex- <br />clusion began. <br /> <br />Areas in the arid and semi-arid portions of the Southwest that are surfaced <br />by desert pavement are much less sensitive to grazing and other use, since <br />the pavement affords a substitute for vegetative cover. <br /> <br />In certain instances the loss or deterioration of vegetative cover may have <br />little noticeable on-site impact but may increase off-site erosion by accel- <br />eration of runoff. This could be particularly evident below urbanized <br />areas where accelerated runoff from pavement and rooftops has increased the <br />stress on dot.nstream channels. Widespread destruction of cover by poor log- <br />ging practices or by brush and timber fires frequently increases channel <br />erosion as well as that on the directly affected watershed slopes. On the <br />other hand; cover disturbances under favorable conditions, such as a cool, <br />moist climate, frequently result in a healing of erosion sources within a <br />few years. <br /> <br />Upland Slope Erosion <br /> <br />This erosion form occurs on sloping watershed lands beyond the confines of <br />valleys. Sheet erosion which involves the removal of a thin layer of soil <br />over an extensive area is usually not visible to the eye. This erosion form <br />is evidenced by the formation of rills. Experience indicates that soil loss <br />from rill erosion can be seen if it amounts to about 5 tons or more per acre. <br />This is equivalent in volume per square mile to approximately 2 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Wind erosion from upland slopes and the deposition of the eroded material in <br />stream channels may be a significant factor. The material so deposited in <br />channels is readily moved by subsequent runoff. <br /> <br />Downslope soil movement due to creep can be an important factor in sediment <br />yield on steep slopes underlain by unstable geologic formations. <br /> <br />Significent gully erosion as a sediment contributor is evidenced by the pre- <br />sence of numerous raw cuts along the hill slopes. Deep soils on moderately <br />steep to steep slopes usually provide an environment for gully development. <br /> <br />Processes of slope erosion must <br />contribute to its development. <br />tions. <br /> <br />be considered in the light of factors which <br />These have been discussed in previous sec- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.