My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06019
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:20:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:24:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/3000
Title
Western States Power
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />01452 <br /> <br />. "Will Be" Plan closes the most efficient office <br /> <br />In a recent letter by a WAPA employee from Salt Lake City, WAPA was criticized for <br />closing its most efficient office. The allegations in the letter were substantiated by <br />using WAPA's own financial data, This letter is attached for your convenience. <br /> <br />As can be seen from the letter, due to the conservative nature of the past and <br />current management in the Montrose office, the work force is very efficient when <br />compared to the other WAPA offices. From maintenance to operations, engineering <br />and administrative functions, the Montrose Office does more with less staff. WAPA <br />would have a difficult time justifying its plan in the private sector using the <br />employee/product ratio. WAPA is blowing smoke when promoting its plan is <br />"business like", <br /> <br />What does this all mean to a CRSP customer and the Upper Basin? It means one of <br />two things. First, CRSP functions will suffer due to lack of staff to accomplish <br />functions, or secondly CRSP will cost more due to less cost effective means to <br />accomplish CRSP functions. Either way CRSP loses!! <br /> <br />. Need for NEPA study <br /> <br />WAPA contends that its "Will-Be" plan is an administrative action and therefore does <br />not fall under NEPA. In most areas of the "Will Be" plan this is true. However, there <br />are many "technical uncertainties" that come under NEPA regarding the operation of <br />CRSP powerplants from Loveland and Phoenix that would require a NEPA because <br />of downstream river concerns. WAPA has not addressed this issue in its 'Will Be" <br />plan. If CRSP is operationally integrated as WAPA has proposed with the Parker- <br />Davis, Hoover, and Pick-Sloan Projects a reality exist that downstream river releases <br />from CRSP power plants will violate existing environmental restrictions. Remember <br />most of the restrictions are not seasonal restrictions as WAPA would like everyone to <br />believe, they are hourly and in the case of Aspinall inches in the River makes a <br />difference!! Again, violations will happen; it will be a reality. <br /> <br />There are many in the utility industry that will criticize WAPA for planning to operate <br />the CRSP transmission system from Loveland using one microwave path. This path <br />is routed over the Continental Divide starting at Steamboat Springs and terminating <br />near Cheyenne, Wyoming. This path is prone to winter outages and due to the <br />remote location can be inaccessible for long periods of time during the winter <br />months. What concerns the experts in the utility industry are if the outage is <br />prolonged no information about the CRSP transmission system will be available in <br />Loveland. This scenario will create a significant reliability situation because of the <br />importance of the CRSP transmission system that is interconnected to other western <br />systems transmission systems. WSCC the reliability coordinating body for the <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.