Laserfiche WebLink
<br />53 ~ ~,:~ <br /> <br />Fountain Valley Conduit municipal and industrial water return flows <br />will account for about a $972,900 increase in value of farm <br />production. Major crops grown are winter wheat, feed prain, <br />forage crops, vegetables, melons and sugar beets. According to <br />a report prepared by the University of Nebraska in 1968, for ~ach <br />$1 increase in gross farm sales, an induced-by-effect (increased <br />sales) of $1.29 will be created among the business sector <br />supplying goods and services to farmers (University of t'ebraska, <br />1968). The report further states that for each $1 increase in <br />gross farm sales a stemming-from effect (net dollar increase 'n <br />activity among processing sector and their suppliers) nf ~".39 <br />would be created in the State of Nebraska. Similar effects are <br />expected to occur in Colorado. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Using this criteria for the Fountain Valley Conduit, the $972,900 <br />of increased gross farm sales would cause an annual increase nf <br />farm-related sales and services of $1,255,000. Tn addition, "he <br />$972,900 of gross farm sales would cause an annual net ~ollar <br />increase in activity among processors and their suppliers nf <br />$4,271,000 Based on the above figures, the Fountain Valley <br />Conduit return flow supplemental irrigation water will create <br />an economic impact of $6,498,900 annually. <br /> <br />Increased gross farm sales generated by return flows from "he <br />Fountain Valley Conduit will create new iobs. The $972,900 <br />increase in gross farm sales will provide an estimated ]l~ new <br />farm-related jobs which will contribute to the economic stability <br />of the rural areas. In addition to the new farm iobs, underemploy- <br />ment and unemployment rates will be reduced. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The avaiJ~bility of project water may influence population "atterns <br />in the Fountain Valley communities. The direct cause-and-effect <br />relationship of water supply and urban growth is a moot point. On <br />one hand the availability of water provides the potential for economic <br />growth of urban centers such as Colorado Springs. On the nther <br />hand, water itself does not cause population growth and the <br />shortage of water does not prevent growth of urban areas. Population <br />growth is influenced much more by other factors than by ',ater supply <br />(McKee and Rice, 1974, Butcher, 1974). A generally desirable <br />location will attract people, and a relatively undesirable rylace <br />will experience outmigration (Rivkin/Carson, 1973). All lcinds of <br />environmental attractions of unequal appeal induce people to <br />resettle. The climate, mountains, lakes, and open country penerally <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IV-19 <br />