<br />SUMMARY (Continued)
<br />
<br />~?~'~:~
<br />
<br />Cost-effectiveness comparison with other salinity control unita!/
<br />
<br />Unit
<br />
<br />Total
<br />annual
<br />costs
<br />
<br />CompletedY
<br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage One Development $2,644,000
<br />Meeker Dom~1 269,000
<br />P1anned~/
<br />Lower Gunnison Basin
<br />Winter water replacement 439,000
<br />Canal s ya t ems
<br />Esst 2,438,000
<br />Selig 3,128,000
<br />South 4,063,000
<br />Garnet 989,000
<br />Loutzenhizer 1,834.000
<br />Total 12,891,000
<br />Grand Valley Unit, Stage Two Development
<br />Price Ditch laterals 692,000
<br />Stub Ditch laterals 69,000
<br />Grand Valley Canal lateral~/ 853,000
<br />Kiefer Extension laterals 271,000
<br />West end portion, Government Highline
<br />Canal laterals 1,634,000
<br />Esst end portion, Government Highline
<br />Canal laterals 532,000
<br />West end portion. Government Highline Canal 711,000
<br />Grand Valley Highline Canal laterals 582,000
<br />East end portion, Government Highline Canal 3,152,000
<br />Middle portion, Government Highline Canal
<br />laterals 2,905,000
<br />Grand Valley Hainline Canal laterals 843,000
<br />Independent Ranchmen's Ditch laterals 201,000
<br />Orchard Mess Canal No.2 laterals 231,000
<br />Orchard Hesa Canal No. 1 laterals 8l3,OOO
<br />Middle portion, Government Highline Canal 5,098,000
<br />Total l8,587,OOO
<br />Uinta Basin Unit
<br />zimmerman Wash subarea 200,500
<br />Pleasant Valley subarea 400,400
<br />Gray Mountain subarea 797,000
<br />Pahcease subarea 76,800
<br />South Fork Dry Gulch subarea 468,800
<br />Purdy-Hidview subarea 303,400
<br />Total 2,246,900
<br />1/ Bssed on current planning interest rate of 8 5/8 percent and
<br />except as noted.
<br />2/ As-constructed costs.
<br />3/ Based on a lOa-year project life.
<br />41 Based on January 1985 price level.
<br />I/ Includes the Mesa County Dit.ch laterals.
<br />61 Adjusted to account for the increase resulting from wildlife mitigation. Actual total
<br />salt Toad reduction could range from 21,000 to 30,000 tons per year.
<br />
<br />S-14
<br />
<br /> Cost
<br />Average effectiveness
<br />salt load ($/ton)
<br />reduction Incre- Cumu 1 a-
<br />(tons/year) mental tive
<br />19,900 133 133
<br />19,000 14 14
<br />74,300 6 6
<br />14,900 164 32
<br />17,800 176 56
<br />20,800 195 79
<br />4,900 202 83
<br />7 ,900 232 92
<br />140,600
<br />19,500 35 35
<br />1,600 43 36
<br />13,000 66 47
<br />3,400 80 50
<br />20,000 82 61
<br />6,400 83 63
<br />8,500 84 66
<br />4,800 121 69
<br />23,300 135 85
<br />19,800 147 95
<br />4,700 179 98
<br />900 223 99
<br />1,000 231 100
<br />3,400 239 104
<br />13,200 386 130
<br />143,500
<br />3,400 59 59
<br />6,400 63 61
<br />9,000 88 74
<br />900 88 75
<br />3,700 125 83
<br />2,100 144 88
<br />1l/25,500
<br />a 50-year project life,
<br />
<br />00(;4_9
<br />
|