My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05654
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:10:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/1/1939
Title
Period of Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br />1 <br />" <br /> <br />,- <br />I, <br />'-' <br /> <br />" <br />r ~ <br />r <br /> <br />APffiNDIX E <br /> <br />2. Develapment of hydroelectric power cannot be' justified from <br />ei ther an engineering or ecC'nomic standpoint.. <br /> <br />3. A 1,000,000 acre-foot reservoir cannot be justified from an <br />engineering standpoint. <br /> <br />4. Do not agree with flN'd control benefit evaluation. <br /> <br />B. Recommendations <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. Re-study be made to determine reservoir capacity that will give <br />gr~test benefit for least cost. <br /> <br />2. Re-study to determine if surface storage can be coordinated <br />with ground water storage. <br /> <br />3. Flood control benefits be reevaluated. <br /> <br />State of New Mexico <br /> <br />A. Comments <br /> <br />1. Maintained project would change flows at Lobatos to detrimSnt <br />of New Mexico. <br /> <br />2. Questioned other prOVisions of projeot plan in connection <br />with proposed use of wat.er. <br /> <br />3. Flood control features poorly conceived and not coordinsted <br />with Middle Rio Grande Project. <br /> <br />4. Generation of hydroelectric power is not feasible. <br /> <br />5. Caploity of reservoir could be greatly reduced and still <br />provide storage for irrigation and limited f1aod cantral. <br /> <br />6. Tems-New Mexico lit;l.gation clouds any propased developnent. <br /> <br />B. Recommendatians <br /> <br />1. Report nC't be transmitted to Cangress at this time. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Power featqres br;l eliminated. <br />" '. <br />. .... . ~ . . . . ~ . . .' <br />central .features 'witb i1liddle <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />:3: . CO~J"d'inate"'flood <br />Project. <br /> <br />Rio' Grande. <br /> <br />4. Evaluate need for main channel storage in New MeXico, including <br />flood control benefits naw claimed for Wagon Wheel Gap Reservoir. <br /> <br />5., No authorization or appropriatians for construotion until proj'ect <br />has been evaluated and uncertainties arising from current liti- <br />gatiC'ns are settled. <br /> <br />E-26 <br /> <br />r -.,.. !.~~ ,~ q <br />i", .....J'-V(:iN <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.