Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"'" <br /> <br />APPENDIX E <br /> <br />State of Texas <br /> <br />A., Comments <br /> <br />1. Storage in Colorado adverse to New Mexioo and Texas and would <br />aggravate the water shortage situation. <br /> <br />B. Reoommendations <br /> <br />1.' Wagon Wheel Gap dam and reservoir'be disapproved and no further <br />consideration be given tC" its development. <br /> <br />Comments by the Federal agenoies were minor critioisms except <br />as they reiterated the comments of t~e states. <br /> <br />Because of the oomments reoeived, it was deoided to reevaulate <br />the project to eliminate insofar as possible all valid objeotions. Follow- <br />ing this deoision, various water supply studies were made, based on modifi- <br />oations of Study 6, to determine the optimum plan of development for <br />irrigation and flood oontrol purposes. Production of hydr~leotric power <br />lilas not to be oonsidered. Ihe studies' are sut:marized as follows: <br /> <br />Studies 7 .7-A and 7-B <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />These three studies pertain to the Gerrard site and are for a <br />/ 700,000 aore-foot, 500),000 aore-foot, and 300,000 aore-foot reservoir at <br />I, the site. The studies were made to determine the most eoonnmioal sbe for <br />irrigation aDd flood oontrol purposes and to asoertain if this site Ddght <br />not be the better of ' the two sites, Gerrard 'or Wagon ~fueel Gap, at a <br />smaller oapaoity. The waters were routed only to Lobatos; hOwever, Compact <br />status was oomputed. The oriteria for these studies are generally the same <br />as those subsequently desoribed for the final Operation Study 12. No size <br />oonclusions were drawn from these studies because the Garrard site could <br />not oompete with the Wagon Wheel Gap site when dam and reservoir dosts were <br />considered. <br /> <br />Studies 8. 9 and 11 <br /> <br />These studies considered reservoirs of 300,000, 500,000 and <br />700,000 aore-foot oapaoities in Wagon Wheel Gap Reservoir and established <br />the optimum irrigation capaoity at the site to be 300,000 aore-feet. <br />Seleotion of the ~apaoity was based on the ~ximum benefits that oould be <br />realized fC'r'the least possible expenditure.. The details of these studies <br />a:t'e'pr~sel'l.ted in Appe.hqii. D -. P~ns 9onsidered." " . _.' , <br />" <br /> <br />study l{)' <br /> <br />!"- <br />I <br />I, <br />~, <br />If, , <br />L---. <br /> <br />Operation study 10 pertains to the Weminuohe Pass T:ransmountain <br />Diversion. The study' showed that an average of 11,700 .;acre-feet could be <br />Imported ,from the Los Pinos watershed to the Rio Grande. Cost estimates <br />established that the plan was not economically feasible at thilS time. Com- <br />plete data on this development are given in Appelldix D -Plans Considered. <br /> <br />E-27 <br /> <br />r-/~':":,~;~I <br />" v'~'" <br />-.J ... J- <br /> <br />" <br />