Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TOPPING ET AL: COLORADO RIVER SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, 2 <br /> <br />548 <br /> 300 <br />ilj- 200 <br />~l <br />c~ <br />z'l' <br /><~ lOll <br /><II. <br />-' ~ <br /><z <br />ZO <br />g~ 0 .. <br />,,0: <br />w< <br />"Ie <br /><IIZ .100 <br />l3~ W <br />"'0 '" <br />".... < <br />zw " <br />-> .200 '" <br />~i= w <br /> 0. <br />z:5 0. <br /><w :> <br />,,0: <br />0 -300 <br /> <br /> ~ ..,. <br /> N z 0< <br /> z 0 Z;o <br /> 0 ;:: Qw <br />~ ;:: 0 ....~ <br />z 0 w Om <br />w "' w< <br />0 <II X "10 <br />t x x <br />w <br />'" <br />X <br /> <br /> <br />0: <br />::> <br />o <br />o <br /><II <br />___ 3--27..g& (DAY 1) ! <br />~ 3-28-96 (DAY 2) <br />______ 3-29-96 (DAY 31 <br />--e- 3-30-96 (DAY 4) <br />____3-31.96 (DA.Y 5) <br />---+- 4-1-96 (DAY 6) <br />-+-4-2-68 (OAY7) <br /> <br />-400 <br />.20 0 20 40 60 BO 100 120 140 180 180 200 220 <br />STREAMWISE DISTANCE FROM UPPER GAGE (m) <br /> <br />Figure 5, Measured changes in cross-sectional sand area on <br />each of the 7 days of high discharge relative to the bed topog- <br />raphy surveyed on the day before the 1996 flood experiment. <br />During the 1996 flood experiment, aggradation (fill) of the bed <br />in the downstream portion of the Grand Canyon gage reach <br />OCCUlTed simulIaneouslywith degradation (scour) of the bed in <br />the upstream portion of the reach. <br /> <br />(Figure 6a). During the 3 weeks following the flood, this bar <br />began to rebuild (as shown by Ihe increase in sand area in cross <br />sections 3 and 4), and tbe volume of sand in the reach recov- <br />ered slightly (Figure 6b). <br /> <br />3. Observations During tbe 1997 Test Flow <br /> <br />3,1. Background <br /> <br />August through September 1997 was a period of substantial <br />sediment transport in the Paria River. During these 2 months, <br />approximately 2.0 :!: 0.4 million t (t indicates metric ton) of <br />sand and 2.4 :!: 1.2 million t of silt and clay were delivered to <br />the Colorado River by a series of large floods in the Paria <br />River [after Topping, 1997J. Most of this sediment input oc- <br />culTed during four large floods: a 115-m'/s flood on August 10, <br />a 72-m'/s flood on September 7, a flood with two peaks of 85 <br />m.l/s and 110 mJ/s on September 15, and a 95-m'/s flood on <br />September 26; three of these floods were greater than the 90 <br />m'/s bank-full discharge (Topping, 1997J of the Paria River. <br />Because of these floods, calendar year 1997 ranked among the <br />top 20% in terms of sand input and among the top 12% in <br />terms of silt and clay input during the 75 yeaTS of gage record <br />on the Paria River. During the months of August and Septem- <br />ber the little Colorado River also supplied sediment to the <br />Colorado River but not in quantities nearly as large as the. <br />sediment inputs from the Paria River. In an attempt to prolong <br />the residence time of this new sediment in Marble and Grand <br />Canyons, a test flow on the Colorado River was designed by <br />the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center to trans- <br />fer some of this sediment from the channel boltom to higher <br />environments on the channel-margin sand bars. This test flow <br />consisted of a steady 877-m'/s (31,000 cfs) flow released from <br />Glen Canyon Oam for 48 huu,s during November 3-5. 1997. <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />3.2_ Metbods <br /> <br />The USGS Ariwna District oonducted a program of sus- <br />pended- and bed~sediment measurements at the four majn- <br />stem gages depicted in Figure 1: thc lees Ferry gage, the <br />lower Marble Canyon gage, the Grand Canyon gage, and the <br />Above Diamond Creek gage. At each of these gages, cross- <br />sectionally averaged suspended-sediment samples were col- <br />lected up to several times daily using 0-77 bag samplers. Bed- <br />sediment samples were collected using BM-54 samplers at the <br />lower Marble Canyon and Above Diamond Creek gages. On <br />November 11, an additional sample of the bed was collected at <br />the Lower Marble Canyon gage using a pipe dredge. <br /> <br />3.3. Results <br /> <br />At all four gages during the 2 days of steady high discharge, <br />as during the 1996 llood experiment, suspended-sand and silt <br />and clay concentrations decreased as the suspended sand <br />ooarsened (Figures 7a-7c). Though the degree of suspended- <br />sand coarsening was similar at all gages, the relative decrease <br />in suspended-sand ooncenlration was greater at the Lower <br />Marble Canyon and Grand Canyon gages than it was at the <br />lees Ferry and Above Diamond Creek gages. Importantly, <br />unlike during the 1996 flood experiment, during the 2 days of <br />the 1997 test flow the sand concentrations measured at the <br />Lower Marble Canyon gage equaled those measured at the <br />Grand Canyon gage. This change occurred by a doubling of the <br />sand-transport rates at the Lower Marble Canyon gage be- <br />tween April 1996 and November 1997, not by a decrease in the <br />sand-transport rates at the Grand Canyon gage. Thus the large <br />sand inputs from the Paria River in 1997 had the effect of <br />doubling the sand export rate from Marble Canyon. This sug- <br />gests that during August-October 1997 (given the upstream <br />flow and sediment boundary conditions that existed), the avail- <br />able environments for storing sand in Marble Canyon were <br />small relative to tbe magnitude of the sand supplied by the <br />Paria River. <br />At both the Lower Marble Canyon and Above Diamond <br />Creek gages, coarsening of the suspended sand was accompa- <br />nied by winnowing of the finer sediment from the bed, though <br />this winnowing occurred in different manneTS at the two gages <br />(Figures 7d and 7e). In evaluating changes in the grain-size <br />distribution of the bed, it is sometimes useful to track changes <br />in both the median grain size 01 the fine sediment (i.e., sand <br />and finer material) and also the fraction of the fine sediment <br />on the bed composed of sand finer than 0.125 mm. The frac- <br />tion of the fine sediment on the bed oomposed of 0.0625- to <br />O.l25-mm sand is a useful indicator of the state of the sand <br />supply because half of the sand input by the Paria and uttle <br />Colorado RiveTS is between 0.0625 and 0.125 mm (D. J. Top- <br />ping, unpublisbed data, 1997). At the lower Marble Canyon <br />gage, winnowing of the finer sediment from the bed caused an <br />increase in the median size of the fine sediment on the bed <br />(from 0.38 to 0.42 mm) and a decrease in the fraction of the <br />fine sediment on the bed composed of 0.0625- to O.I25-mm <br />sand (from 3.1 10 \.2%). The bed at this site continued to <br />coarsen during the 5 days of moderately high flows (ranging <br />from 447 m'/s (15,800 cfs) to 63\ m'/s (22,300 cfs)) following <br />the 2-day lest flow. By November 11 the median size of the fine <br />sediment on the bed had incrcased from 0.42 to 0.47 mm, and <br />the fraction of the fine sediment on the bed composed of <br />0.0625- 10 O.l25-mm sand had decreased from \.2 to 0.67%. At <br />the farthest downstream gage, the Above Diamond Creck <br />gage, the bed sedimenl was also winnowed during the test flow <br /> <br />-' <br />~ <br />u: <br />