My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05649
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05649
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.D
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/2000
Author
Topping et al.
Title
Colorado River Sediment Transport
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TOPPING ET AL: COLORADO RIVER SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, 2 <br /> <br />''''''' <br /> <br />1200 <br /> <br />{ 1000 <br />w <br />" <br />~ <br />< <br />Ii eoo <br />~ <br />Ci <br />~ <br />w <br />~ <br />~ eoo <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />...~... LWRIAHWLECYMGIr.OI:D-T7lJJY'. SMtD <br />-.- GfIAHl) CNfYOH GAGE ,.." IUSP. 6oIoHD <br />.....-. aMHO CANYON OI.QE 1)-71""'. SNCl <br />-"-12:l.wl.lEOOYO-nlllJSP8fDEl)&MIl) <br />___ NATIONAL CAH'/'ClH BADE ....II1U$P.1AHD <br />--0- ClAANO CYN QAOE f'IrtE flEl*l1EHT0H.. <br /> <br />""" <br /> <br /> <br />547 <br /> <br />0." <br /> <br />050 <br /> <br />0.45 <br /> <br />0.40 <br /> <br />0.35 0 <br />. <br />I <br />0.30 - <br /> <br /> <br />0.25 <br /> <br />0.20 <br /> <br />Q.t5 <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />m~.1~1~2~3~4~6~8~7~+f <br /> <br />1400 <br /> <br /> 1200 X lWFI MN8..E CYN o.771NCl <br /> + LWR lMRIlf CYN 0.17 aT" a..AY <br /> . QllWl)c:AHrClfNl11Wt:l <br /> 0 GRNClCYNI4I"T&Q..AY <br /> . QfWIO CNNtlH ll-n &fH) <br />~1000 () OIWlJ(:'I'ND-77....r.a..AV <br /> .. 122-*f:EDmD-74lWi1D <br />1. '" 1I2-M1J:EDClYD-745U&a..AY <br />W . MATIOtW. C'l'N ..." SAHO <br />" 0 M.II~CYl\IP'" 111.1 ..cu.y <br />~ <br />< <br />Ii eoo <br />~ I <br />Ci <br />~ <br />w <br />!< ... <br />!< <br /> I X <br /> 400 <br /> + <br /> 200 DA.Y, <br /> OAY3 DAY4 DAY 5 DAY6 DAV 7 <br />b) <br /> <br /> <br />0.17 <br />0.18 <br />0.15 <br />0.14 <br />0.13 <br />0.12 <br />0.11 ~ <br />o <br />0.10 m <br />~ <br />a.OS! ~ <br />0.08 0 <br />z <br />0.07 i <br />0.06 l <br />0." <br />0." <br />0.03 <br />0.02 <br />0.Q1 <br />0.00 <br /> <br />Figure 4. Sediment grain size and concentration during the 19% flood experiment. At all locations where <br />measurements were made during the flood, the line sediment on the bed and suspended sand coarsened as the <br />concentration of suspended sand decreased. (a) Hydrograph of the 1996 flood experiment (as measured at the <br />Grand Canyon gage), spatially averaged median size of the line sediment on the bed, and spatially averaged <br />median size of suspended sand measured at four sites. Error bars are 1 standard deviation. The travel time of <br />the flood wave between the various sites has been removed in Figure 4a such thaI the beginning of day 1 al <br />each site corresponds to the time of the beginning of steady high discharge at each site. At the Grand Canyon <br />gage the samples collected with Ihe P-61 sampler were coarser than those collected with the 0-77 sampler <br />because (I) the P-61 was only deployed at two verticals in the centra12/3 oflhe channel (see Figure 2), whereas <br />the D-77 was deployed at five verticals across the entire channel, and (2) a P-6I sampler samples much closer <br />to the bed Ihan a D-77 sampler. (b) Hydrograph of the 1996 flood experiment (as measured at the Grand <br />Canyon gage) and spatially averaged concentrations of suspended sand and suspended silt and clay measured <br />at four sites. Error bars are one standard deviation. <br /> <br />tant issue is revisited in section 6.1. The maximum volume of <br />sediment in the reach was attained on day 4 (Figure 6b), <br />correlating fairly well with the time of maximum bed elevation <br />at the cableway on days 4-5 (Figure 3). After day 4 of the <br />flood. erosion of sand from the reach dominated (Figure 6b) as <br />the bed at the cableway began to ,cour (Figure 3b), possibly <br /> <br />driven by the measured depletion of the upstream supply of <br />sand (Figure 4b). The grealest amount of erosion in the reach <br />occurred during the receding limb of the 1996 flood not during <br />the 7 days of high discbarse (Figure 6b). This erosion was due <br />to the catastrophic failure of an eddy bar on river left in cross <br />sections 3 and 4 beginning at 10:00 A.M. MST on ApriL 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.