My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05649
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05649
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:19:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.D
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/2000
Author
Topping et al.
Title
Colorado River Sediment Transport
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />TOPPING ET AL: COLORADO RIVER SEDIMENf TRANSPORT, 2 <br /> <br />549 <br /> <br /> 200 <br />-' t <br /><( <br />ZOE 100 <br />Q.... - -' <br />....w"' -' <br />0> 0> u: <br />w- cD 0 <br />en.... OJ 0:: <br />005 '" :J <br />enW z -100 0 <br />00:: 0 0 <br />0::<( <( -0- X-S 4 en <br />ow w -<>- X-S 3 t <br />zO:: 0:: -200 <br />-<( <( -u- X-S 2 <br />we e <br />Clz z __X-51 <br />z<( <( -300 --+- X-S 0 <br />:2(1) (I) <br />0 <br /> -400 N .. ~ in <br /> iD F'" .. <br />a) w > > > ~ ~ ~ > > ~~ <br /> 8 ~" < ~ < < < ,. <br /> '" <z B B B B ~ <z <br /> '" o~ ~ 8 III ~ III 0< <br /> <110 ., do .. ",'" <br /> '" 0 <br /> '" '" '" ~ ~ <br /> '" '" '" <br /> sooo <br /> <br /> <br />wW <br />::<::< <br />:J:J 0 <br />-,-' <br />00 - <br />>>wE <br />~!i;; -5000 <br /><(<( 0> <br />enen <b <br />zO ~ <br />-I- .10000 <br />WW z <br />Cl<!: 0 <br />:i~ <br />:I:w -15000 <br />00:: <br /> <br /> <br />-20000 <br /> <br />b) <br /> <br />Figure 6, (a) Measured change in cross.sectional sand area over lime relative to the bed topography <br />surveyed on the day before the 1996 flood experiment. (b) Changes in sand volume in the 158-m-long reach <br />upstream from the Grand Canyon cableway during the period encompassing the 1996 flood experiment. <br />Volumes were computed using the data in Figure 6a. In Figures 6a and 6b, the cross-hatched region indicates <br />the 7 days of steady high discharge; the scale of the x axis is compressed during the 3 weeks prior to and after <br />the flood. <br /> <br />but in a different manner than at the Lower Marble Canyon <br />gage. At this site the fraction of the fine sediment on the bed <br />composed of 0.0625- to O.l25-mm sand decreased from 2.6 to <br />0.33%, while the median size of the fine sediment on the bed <br />actually decreased from 0.41 to 0.35 mm. <br /> <br />4. Vertical Trends in the Grain-Size Distribution <br />of Colorado River Flood Deposits <br /> <br />4.1. Deposits of the 1996 Flood <br /> <br />Rubin el al. (19981 sampled the deposits of the 1996 flood <br />experiment in trenches on five eddy bars between Lees Ferry <br />and Diamond Creek (Figure 1). Just as the suspended and bed <br />sediment coarsened during the 1996 flood (Figures 4 and 8), <br />the sediment deposited during the flood also coarsened (Fig- <br />ure 8). Prior to Rubin el al. [1998], production of inversely <br />graded deposits during floods had been documented by lseya <br />(1989] in Japanese rivers. Production of the inverse grading in <br />the 1996 flood deposits occurred both by coarsening of the sand <br />and a reduction in the content of silt and clay. As with the sus- <br />pended sand, coarsening of the sand OCUIITcd nOI merely by the <br /> <br />removal of fines but also by an increase in the modal size and <br />an increase in size oflhe coarsest fraction [Topping et al., 1999]. <br /> <br />4.2, Deposits of the 1997 Test Flow <br /> <br />Deposits of the 1997 test flow were sampled in trenches on <br />eight eddy baTS between Lees Ferry and the Grand Canyon <br />gage (Figure 1). At each site, samples were collected at mul- <br />tiple elevations between the base and top of the deposit. At <br />several sites (i.e., upper Eminence Break and Tanner), vertical <br />sample sets were also coUected at different distances from the <br />edge of the main channel. Where deposits were sampled in <br />different lateral locations, they generally fined toward the <br />bank. Just as the suspended and bed sediment coarsened dur- <br />ing the test flow (Figures 7 and 9), the sediment deposited <br />during the 2-day test flow also coarsened (Figure 9). As with <br />the 1996 flood deposits, this occurred by both coarsening of the <br />sand and a reduction in the content of silt and clay. Also, as in <br />1996, coarsening of the sand occurred nOl merely by the re- <br />moval of fines but also by an increase in the modal size and an <br />incrc;1<;e in size of the coarsest fraction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.