My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05579
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:21:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:07:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8147
Description
Gunnison-Arkansas Project
State
CO
Water Division
4
Date
11/24/1948
Author
Pol Rev Com Gun-Ark
Title
Minutes of Meeting Policy and Review Committee Gunnison-Arkansas Project Colorado with attached reports and documentation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I . <br /> <br />'.' ~020 <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />f <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Messrs. Ho~r and Delaney expressed their appreoiation of the Bureau of <br />Reolamation s oooperation in this problem. It 1IIlI.S agreed that this BUbjeot <br />'IIOuld be retlLiDBd em the Agenda. <br /> <br />Replaoement RequireJ:IBnts at Aspen (Item b of the Agenda). <br /> <br />11. lIr. Riter explained informally the revised studies made by him. in <br />oollaboration w:l.th Engineers Jex and PO\'iIIlll lIlid in which !.lessrs.' Tipton and <br />Gildersleeve also partioipated as they 'MIre studying the problem in more <br />detail. The revised studies were requested by the Committee at its last <br />meeting. Ur. Riter oompared studies made by the Bureau group and those cade <br />by the Water Board. He S'tated to the Committee tlui.t Ur. Gilder'sleeve's study <br />was based on daily disoharge reoords and figures obtained by him were !'l'obably <br />more preoise than those obtained by the Bureau engineers for replaoement purposes <br />of the Ultimate Twin LakBs and the Initial Phase Gwmisem..Arb.n'sas Projeots, <br />but that there was olose agre8l:lent bet'l'leen the results of the two studies. A <br />tentative lI\IIlIlIIll.!' of storage requirements at the Aspen Reservoir site, utilizing <br />the results of both studies, was suggested by Yr. Riter to the Committee as <br />tollows : <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Replaoement Purposes <br />Ultimate Twin Lakes Diversion <br /> <br />Aore~feet <br /> <br />6,100 <br /> <br />Initial Phase Guxmison..Arlamsas Project <br />Diffioult Creek <br /> <br />3,100 <br /> <br />2,100 <br /> <br />Possible winter diversions by Initial <br />Phase Gwmison-Arkansas Project <br /> <br />5,000 <br /> <br />Subtotal <br /> <br />16,300 <br /> <br />Other Purposes <br />Supply natural shortages at Aspen <br />Supply future industrial uses <br /> <br />6,100 <br /> <br />1,700 <br /> <br />Subtotal <br /> <br />7,600 <br /> <br />Total for all uses <br /> <br />24,100 aore-feet <br /> <br />12. Judge Stone suggested that an Engineering Committee be established <br />to study this problem in detail. Follow.ine; further discussion by the ConDittee <br />the follovline; Engineering AdvisDZlY Committee TIM designated by the Chairnan to <br />consider this matter end prepare Il report for submission to members of the <br />Steering Comdttee and the Policy and Review Committee at least one week in <br />advance of the n~ meetings: <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.