My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05556
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05556
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:07:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.600
Description
South Platte Projects - Chatfield Dam and Lake
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
1/1/1967
Author
Black and Vetch
Title
Report on Chatfield Project for Board of Water Commissioners City and County of Denver
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'. <br /> <br />e. Abandonment of Plum Creek Pumping Station and Conduit 24. <br /> <br /> <br />Acquisition of remaining water rights in City Ditch and transfer <br /> <br /> <br />of these rights to the Board's South Platte River intake are <br /> <br /> <br />prerequisites for this alternative. <br /> <br /> <br />B. Recommendations <br /> <br /> <br />The principal recommendations resulting from this study are presented <br /> <br /> <br />in detail later in the report and are briefly set forth below. <br /> <br /> <br />1. It is recommended that the Kassler Treatment Plant be retained <br /> <br /> <br />at its present location. The estimated cost of $781,000 for protective works <br /> <br /> <br />should be paid the Board, and the Board should assume responsibility for pro- <br /> <br /> <br />tection or rehabilitation of the plant due to flood water damage. <br /> <br /> <br />2. It is recommended that Conduit 20 be left undisturbed in its pre- <br /> <br /> <br />sent location in the Deer Creek Valley. The Board should request the Corps <br /> <br /> <br />to locate Colorado Highway No. 75 so that the highway embankment will not <br /> <br /> <br />adversely affect Conduit 20. The estimated cost of $674,000 for relocating <br /> <br /> <br />Conduit 20 should be pa.id the Board in lieu of such relocation, and the <br /> <br /> <br />Board should assume maintenance and repair of the conduit due to flood damage. <br /> <br /> <br />3. It is recommended that the Board accept the Corps plan for re- <br /> <br /> <br />location of Conduit 10 to the west and crossing Deer Creek Valley via the <br /> <br /> <br />new highway embankment and bridge. <br /> <br /> <br />4. It is rocornmended that the Corps plan for a Conduit 10 Pumping Station <br /> <br /> <br />be accepted by the Board. This pumping station should have a firm pumping <br /> <br /> <br />capacity of'45 million gallons per day and a clearwell of adequate capacity <br /> <br /> <br />for pump suction. It is further recommended that the Board negotiate a lump <br /> <br /> <br />sum settlement with the Corps for payment of operation and maintenance ex- <br /> <br /> <br />penses of this pumping station. The term of capitalization for these expenses <br /> <br /> <br />should be the life of the Chatfield Project, namely 100 years. The capitalized <br /> <br />- 10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.