My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05515
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:05:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/13/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #14
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\,i11 be a great task whereas if some automatic clause whereby <br /> <br />a commission may be called at some later time were inserted, <br /> <br />then it would be simpler, <br /> <br />.!i' <br /> <br />ViR. EMERSON: I believe I would feel that way about it, <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />I would not \4ant to agree to any time limit that would harm <br /> <br />rights that had been developed up to .that time and vested. <br /> <br />However, I feel I might concur in a time limit consideration <br /> <br />of this compact, at any time say fifty years from now, or a <br /> <br />hundred years from now, \-Ihen possibly it could be shown how <br /> <br />r <br />i <br />;: <br /> <br />it will.work out, without feeling that an injustice was done to <br /> <br />any person. I believe He could depend upon the spirit of fair <br /> <br />play of the citizens involved, that any adjustments that \-Iere <br /> <br />felt to be needed would be made. I don't know as I would set <br /> <br />any limit of years, as suggested, but would allow an elastic <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />time limit, leaving to the spirit of fair play the question of <br /> <br />\-Ihether the states shall continue this compact inthe. same form, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />or shall dra\-l up another that will not materially prejudice <br /> <br />any state or any interest in any of the states,th,at ,is <br />.. '. ' . <br /> <br />recognition shall be given under the new circumstanc~s to <br /> <br />present rights and those \-Ihich shall at tha~ time have become <br /> <br />established within the compact, we are now considering., <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: You could not very I-lell destroy rights that <br /> <br />had been established under the compact. <br /> <br />t. <br /> <br />MR. EMERSON: . No, you could not destroy the rights, - may-. <br /> <br />tt <br /> <br />be that is a little strong expression. <br /> <br />MR.' CARPENTER: The rights would vest during the term <br /> <br />according to the compact. <br /> <br />14th.:.s.F, <br />19 <br /> <br />165 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.