Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. CAlmm:11: I think we should not try to provide the <br /> <br />exact things for which the future commission shall meet, ex- <br /> <br />cept to provide for modification of the compact, if necessary, <br /> <br />under then existing circumstances. <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />MR. S. B. DAVIS: If you want to do away with the necess- <br /> <br />ity of legislative action, you have got to fix a time. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: You must fix the right to demand a revision <br /> <br />and through the adoption of the pact itself, and this would <br /> <br />need be a matter of review through legislation. <br /> <br />MR. CAWWE11: Just briefly, for a short discussion, <br /> <br />suppose that, as suggested, the states may be called together <br /> <br />at the request of four of the states for the purpose of con- <br /> <br />side ring modification. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: There are four states in the upper basin, and <br /> <br />three in the lower basin. <br /> <br />MR. CAWWE11: VIell, say three. <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />MR. NORVIE1: One might be sufficient. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />HR. CARPENTER: Some one of the upper states vlOuld probably <br /> <br />be willing enough to let the others have a convention if they <br /> <br />wanted it. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: In that way, there should not be any object- <br /> <br />ion to a call by one or two. <br /> <br />HR. CALDv~11: I think we should have two. <br /> <br />Hi(. CARPENTER: vTould it be reasonable to a1101-1 one lone <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />state to 'f(lTCe a recurrence of vThat all of us have gone through, <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />just because some particular people in that stato at that moment <br /> <br />felt the need of it. That would probably be a little extreme, <br /> <br />,^Thereas if two states '.rere similarly affected no <br /> <br />doubt the re- <br />l4th-S.F. <br />20 <br /> <br />166 <br /> <br />vision might be needed. <br />166 <br />