<br />002551
<br />
<br />'Parochial,' Says MWD
<br />
<br />By way of making southern California's opposition official,
<br />the board of directors of the Metropolitan Water District for-
<br />mally dissapproved the bill as passed out by the Senate Interior
<br />Committee as "essentially a parochial rather than regional
<br />approach."
<br />
<br />Colorado and the Upper Basin states didn't like the CAP
<br />bill as it now stood, either. Rep. Wayne N. Aspinall (D-Colo.),
<br />chairman of the House Interior Committee, said the action of
<br />the Senate committee was "the death knell for any Colorado
<br />River legislation this year." U. S. Sen. Gordon Allott (R-Colo.)
<br />thought the lack of Hualapai Dam and a water import fore-
<br />closed any future development in the entire Colorado River
<br />Basin.
<br />
<br />Amidst all this antagonism there came a refreshing and
<br />unexpected note of friendliness in the editorial columns of the
<br />Washington Post amounting to an endorsement of CAP. "Even
<br />with all the water it has a right to claim from the Colorado
<br />River, Arizona will still face critical shortages," said the Post.
<br />"In these circumstances there should be no controversy over
<br />the granting of federal aid for what is essentially a rescue
<br />operation. . . .We think Congress would be well advised to end
<br />the long controversy over water for parched Arizona by accepting
<br />the Senate committee bill with possibly additional refinements."
<br />
<br />Would the bill now pass the Senate? If so, could it get
<br />through the House? In a talk before the Young Democrats of
<br />Greater Tucson, Evo DeConcini, Vice Chairman of the Arizona
<br />Interstate Stream Commission, answered the two questions re-
<br />spectively: probably so and quite possibly not. "We're in better
<br />shape this year than we have ever been in the past," said Mr.
<br />DeConcini. "First, it is only July and the bill is nearly ready
<br />for Senate action. . . . I predict it will pass within a month."
<br />He also noted that it was not an election year. Congressmen
<br />weren't in a hurry to get home. Finally, if CAP didn't pass that
<br />year, it could be brought back the following year without having
<br />to go through lengthy committee hearings again.
<br />
<br />Northwest Stands Firm
<br />
<br />The big hurdle was in the House. And powerful opposition
<br />still was forthcoming from California and the Northwest. The
<br />rigidity of Northwestern opinion was demonstrated during a
<br />hearing by the Senate Interior Committee on the appointment
<br />of David S. Black as Undersecretary of the Interior. The sub-
<br />ject of surplus water came up during a discussion about surplus
<br />power, and Sen. Mark O. Hatfield (R-Ore.) made the point
<br />that any apparent excess of water in the Northwest was a
<br />"surface illusion." "There is no data, statistics or evidence to
<br />define a water surplus," he said. "Unless we move on the basis
<br />of water statesmanship rather than political muscle, we're not
<br />going to solve the (water) question." Senator Hatfield added
<br />
<br />-6-
<br />
<br />~2"<:.::
<br />
<br />.....'-. .:..-:r
<br />,'. ~-. .t.; -....;"..; "'.
<br />. A -': - :..:~-~:.;"_~:.:I"
<br />-.'
<br />
<br />.,.,-.
<br />. '.
<br />
<br />'. ".; ,: '. '~'-
<br />
<br />. <:;....:. . "
<br />.. -'.
<br />
<br />. . ,'".:':: '-..-' ,.......,.
<br />,",.; .;.;'. ':. ".- ."
<br />
<br />i~;;jt~~~~~
<br />
<br />'.
<br />
<br />.-,-' .
<br />
<br />-"," .-..'." '"
<br />
<br />., . ..
<br />......-.. ..........:::...:...-'.'.;;:,..:...:.::.
<br />. -.': "-';":,: .... ,:;;~'. ~:' ..:; -.' ;". ::.
<br />
<br />',- .'...... '.' ..'
<br />. ; . ,'. ';:.' ~.'. . '" .~. - '."
<br />.:,.'."::.',
<br />,". '.
<br />.;. ':'. ,...,,:: - ;. :..~ ". ::"-~'-:" . "':".: .:
<br />
<br />';;h.'\';;:;~18~'
<br />
<br />'/.; .:.::.:\.':..f::',l;:,:;.:))....:.
<br />~:.:::::':::~: :,~,,:,,~".< .-': ".=.:-' ..,:~..
<br />'.'. .
<br />
<br />~'.' ... .;.;.
<br />, :"':':"~
<br />
<br />..- .
<br />....- .
<br />
<br />:;'.:. ..:'. ...... :.' "';;.~ ~:.~ . .... - - '.:- . :':-
<br />: - ':;:, ,,';".~ .:. ,-..:..' ,-.' '. '.. :.' :.. ':; .:....'
<br />'.':'
<br />
<br />...~..
<br />
<br />.: '.. .:~ '-'
<br />
<br />,.:'
<br />
<br />'. ."'....
<br />
<br />..... .
<br />~~ :';. '.",
<br />'. ,',: ,;.: ..:'.:.~~'.' .... '.
<br />
<br />..... -.:.
<br />
<br />. ' ....
<br />
|