My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05232
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:55:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8027
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Federal Agencies - BOR - Lower Missouri Region - Denver
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
10/1/1974
Author
Upper South Platte U
Title
Steering Committee Report - Upper South Platte Unit - Colorado - August 1974
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />{\r.')oC:'~~ <br />.Ut...0'--' <br /> <br />::<;ts~;!;~~ <br /> <br />eastern slope storage would be built at this time <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />D. Water Conservation Measures and East Slope Water Sources Should <br /> <br />Meet Future Needs (Colorado Council of Trout Unlimited, Robert Weaver) <br /> <br />"Water conservation through both structural improvements in the water <br /> <br />system and management measures shouLd be a primary factor in Metropolitan <br /> <br />Water Planning, and need projections should be based on a reduced per <br /> <br />;gi,;;,;j~ <br /> <br />capita consumption rather than an ever increasing per capita consumption <br /> <br />to meet a seemingly unlimited demand. Water conservation measures would <br /> <br />be most useful as a first step in a system for stretching and augmenting <br /> <br />Denver's water supply in stages instead of going the all or nothing route <br /> <br />with Two Forks Dam or some equivalent storage facility. <br /> <br />[ SeveraL Steering Committee Members felt that the Bureau had] <br /> <br />"presented the problem of future Metropolitan water supply as a black and <br /> <br />white situation, either we build Two Forks or the equivalent to satisfy <br /> <br />future water needs, or do nothing and face major shortages. This type of <br /> <br />reasoning could only lead to one conclusion - Two Forks ... <br /> <br />[As indicated by recent sharp fluxuations in the Metro growth rate, <br /> <br /> <br />growth is and will be subject to a large number of variables and current <br /> <br />DRCOG projections mayor may not materialize.J <br /> <br />"Thus, for the intermediate planning period, it would seem reasonable <br /> <br />to give serious consideration to a mix of several alternatives to Two Forks <br /> <br />that could be implemented in stages as the needs materialized. This would <br /> <br />-19- <br /> <br /> <br />;;:t~}.t.r:~;:tf:i <br />R:1N~,;:;;;:f; <br />.~....- - .-.-.' '." <br />.....-', <br /> <br />~:;;~~i:;"" <br /> <br />~ -' '-.:.- . <br />-::-:..::+;..- ..-.-". <br />/- <br />>.' ...";; <br /> <br />encourage more efficient use of our water resources, and construction of <br /> <br />Two Forks could be delayed, giving the city of Denver and the state more <br /> <br />time to determine priorities in water use and to implement sensible Land <br /> <br />use planning <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.