My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05232
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:55:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8027
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Federal Agencies - BOR - Lower Missouri Region - Denver
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
10/1/1974
Author
Upper South Platte U
Title
Steering Committee Report - Upper South Platte Unit - Colorado - August 1974
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Of'- ~'O , J <br />U C. 0 Ii: "~ <br /> <br />The Committee expressed a d.esLre to visit the prospective reservoir <br /> <br />sites, and, though the Ferndale possibility was tena.tive at the time, <br /> <br />a field trip to the three areas was arranged for September 12,. 1973. <br /> <br />Twelve <br /> <br />non-federal Steering Committee members participated in the day long trip. <br /> <br />In addition to visiting the sites, three other matters were of special interest <br /> <br />to the Committee, and arrangements were made for special presentations. <br /> <br />These included discussion of the need for the project, by the Denver Water <br /> <br />Department; potential use of Chatfield Dam for M&l Water storage, <br /> <br />by.the Corps of Engineers; and the need for the Strontia Springs facility,. <br /> <br />When the three major reservoir sites were selected as alternatives <br /> <br /> <br />by the Denver Water Department. <br /> <br />the Committee's considerations changed from one of relatively objective <br /> <br />and constructive discussion to a more adversary process. <br /> <br />Though the <br /> <br />Committee had previously agreed not to base its discussions on the <br /> <br />metropolitan Denver area growth question, newer committee members <br /> <br />insisted on discussing this matter, as well as the disadvantages of each <br /> <br />of the three proposed dam sites. <br /> <br />At its June to, 1974 meeting, the ::Steering Committee decided to prepare <br /> <br />a report describing its activities, rather than formally taking a position on <br /> <br />one or another of the alternatives. <br /> <br />Ma ny members desired, however, to <br /> <br />express their opinions, and Section rr and the Appendix of the Steering <br /> <br />Committes's Report were provided as vehicles for this purpose... It should <br /> <br />be noted that the Committee adopted a motion, stating that the Bureau had <br /> <br />not fully examined all the alternatives to a storage facility. <br /> <br />,.-p-' <br />"OF p. ,"'_ <br />~~~;i;~I'j1~ <br /> <br />. .:'~:_. -:~. . '. 00,. <br />;.','J_ . '._ <br />...-.-:';". -;;A~~ <br />, :':";:':~'.' -~.., ^. . <br /> <br /> <br />~~f~~iJ"::~~t:\i~0~:'f:~~'j'/%~:c;f~lS1i'~~j"';;j~~~3B~)i;3'~?i'?~i$!~~~~ <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.