Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />.-\ <br />~ <br />-' <br /> <br />B. Funding Plans <br />Table 3 summarizes the budgeted expenditures for each fiscal year by <br />object classification. The total estimated budget for the three fiscal <br />years is $286,000 of which only $200,000 have been currently allocated <br />by the Water Resources Council to conduct the specific problem analysis <br />activities in the Missouri Reqion. An additional $86,000, available in the <br /> <br />contingency fund held in reserve by the Water Resources Council, is required <br /> <br />for the r'1issouri River Basin Commission to conduct the specific problem <br /> <br />analysis activities in Missouri Region as outlined in Section III of this <br /> <br />agreement. <br /> <br />The additional $86,000 (of which ~84,400 is programmed for the states) <br /> <br />will be required for the Missouri River Basin Commission to articulate the <br /> <br />indispensable state/regional viewpoint concerning water and related problems <br /> <br />and issues and to display and describe this viewpoint in a nationally <br /> <br />consistent format. To obtain this viewpoint and also to have maximum value <br /> <br />to users, the states must have a major role in the assessment efforts. It <br /> <br />should be noted that the states will be asked to commit substantial manpower <br /> <br />and funds to an assessment mandated at the federal level, for which no <br /> <br />state appropriations have been programmed. Specifically, substantial <br /> <br />efforts will be required from each of the 10 basin states to provide <br /> <br />extensive intrastate as well as interstate coordination, Each state will <br /> <br />be requested to: (1) establish the state goals, objectives and desires <br /> <br />with regard to national and regional development, economic growth, environ- <br /> <br />mental quality and social well being of the state's population; (2) det~rmine <br /> <br />the preferred alternative future for the state and display it's deviation <br /> <br />from the central case, the modified central case, and the regional preference <br />future; (3) identify, analyze and describe problem areas, problem issues and <br />opportunities as they are affected by the state/regional and nationwide <br /> <br />assumptions and methodologies; (4) determine and display the impacts and <br /> <br />-15- <br />