WSP04844 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Group A participants will review the results of the staff analysis and comment on its completeness and validity. t- ':..1 .s' .-l Subactivity 4 -- Obtain Regionwide Review of and Reaction to Problems To obtain broader reaction to the results of subactivities two and three, Group B participants will be provided the necessary problem lists, maps, analytical area delineations and other materials for reviewing and commenting on the results of subactivities two and three as \~ell as supple- menting the information requested in these subactivities. The study director and the staff will synthesize the results of, subactivity 4 for review by the Overview Committee. After review and endorsement by the Overview Committee, the study director will document the results of Activity One (Problem Identification) in a technical memorandum to be presented to the MRBC and subsequently transmi tted to \'IRC. ACTIVITY TWO - SELECT STATE/REGIONAL DESIRES AND OBJECTIVES; SCREEN PROBLEMS AND DOCUrmn Assur~PTIONS AIID METHODOLOGIES The objectives of this activity are to: (1) develop a regional preference future; (2) develop a final list of problems, problem areas, and analytical areas; and (3) document all assumptions and methodologies. To meet these three objectives, seven subactivities will be conducted by the regional assessment participants. Subactivity 5 - Review and Evaluation of Nationwide Analysis Results The information and data furnished by the Water Resources Council out- lining the modified central case will be transmitted to the Group A participants for review and analysis and will be utilized by the~, in part, to evolve the state and regional preference futures (subactivities 6 and 7). Subactivity 6 - Develop the State Preference Future The state preference future is the individual state's desired and projected level of development and/or nondevelopment for the time periods 1975-1985 and 1985-2000, consistent with that state's goals, objectives, -7-