Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Table 1I.13.-Summary of Impacts and comparison 01 resourcells.sues . continued <br /> <br /> <br /> Impacts' <br /> Proposed PI.n' <br /> Phase I <br />Resource No Action 1980 FES Plan A B Phase II <br />Water quallty-contlnued <br />La Plata River Same as above. Same as above. No impacts. Minimal impacts. Minimal Impacts. <br />San Juan River Samu as above. Same as above. Minimal Impacts. Minimal Impacts. Minimal Impacts. <br />Aquatic re.ource. <br />Trout (Animas River) Stocking practices by Reduced nows; two No Impacts; three Reduced standing crop of Same Impacts as In <br /> CDOW would continue. seasonal minimum minimum bypass flow trout 20% to 25%; three Phase I. Stage B. <br /> bypass flow regimes. regimes. minimum bypass flow <br /> regimes. <br />NatIve Fishery <br />Animas River Potential Impacts as a No Impacts assessed. s10% reduction. Reduced flows; S20% Same Impacts as In <br /> result of future water Impacts would be similar reduction In native fish Phase I. Stage B. <br /> developments. to those In Phase I, habitat. <br /> Stag. B. <br />La Plata River Potential significant No Impacts assessed. No Impacts. No Impacts. Bypass flow No additional Impacts. <br /> impacts as a resllll Project operation would regIme and fish passage. "tI <br /> of future water have eliminated native way Included at Southern a <br /> developments. fish below Southem Ute Ute Diversion Dam. ~g <br /> Diversion Dam. CDa <br />Mancos River No change from existing No Impacts assessed. No Impacts. No Impacts. No significant Impacts. ~ ). <br /> trends. Impacts would have .... C') <br /> ~ .... <br /> ertects similar to those of g <br /> Phase II. .~ <br />San Juan River San Juan Recovery No impacts. Minor losses No impacts. Minor Impacts. Minor Impacts. ~Q. <br /> Implementation Program to pool and backwater If <br /> (San Juan RIP) would habitat and to 'suckers.' <br /> benefit nallve fish. <br />~ "0.... <br /> iil''' <br /> :;, 3l <br /> <br />